|
[Sponsors] |
June 18, 2009, 23:10 |
What has happend to the edges of domain
|
#1 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I use rhoSimpleFoam to simulate a blade of gas turbine. This is the picture of the simulation result. http://user.qzone.qq.com/76247914/ph...FlyYK9YkAAA!!/ What has happend to the edges of domain? Is there something wrong with the cyclic boundary conditions? |
|
June 18, 2009, 23:13 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
|
|
June 18, 2009, 23:36 |
checkMesh
|
#3 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
checkMesh
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create polyMesh for time = constant Time = constant Mesh stats points: 160248 faces: 454912 internal faces: 429824 cells: 147456 boundary patches: 6 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 147456 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ... Patch Faces Points Surface topology row_1_BLADE 6912 7128 ok (non-closed singly connected) row_1_SHROUD 4608 4856 ok (non-closed singly connected) row_1_HUB 4608 4856 ok (non-closed singly connected) row_1_OUTFLOW 1536 1617 ok (non-closed singly connected) row_1_INFLOW 768 825 ok (non-closed singly connected) row_1_PER 6656 6930 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... This is a 3-D mesh Overall domain bounding box (0.6063716664 -0.09400876493 -0.06) (0.8094251252 0.05889179552 0.163938279) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) dimensions 3 Boundary openness (-2.53523191331e-19 3.19783473277e-19 4.97898165194e-19) Threshold = 1e-06 OK. Max cell openness = 1.90379145707e-15 OK. Max aspect ratio = 335.077993397 OK. Minumum face area = 8.94726575451e-10. Maximum face area = 9.81471952282e-05. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 5.60997898251e-14. Max volume = 2.49818970804e-07. Total volume = 0.00251046768668. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 50.1995248971 average: 14.3396737008 Threshold = 70 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 1.5808312121 OK. Mesh OK. End |
|
June 19, 2009, 03:28 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Sorry, I can't see any pictures of your domain ...
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
June 19, 2009, 04:15 |
This is the picture
|
#5 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
This is the picture
|
|
June 19, 2009, 04:34 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Yes this looks strange. Can you provide a picture of the actual mesh?
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
June 19, 2009, 04:43 |
this is grid
|
#7 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
this is grid
|
|
June 19, 2009, 04:47 |
shroud grid
|
#8 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
this is shroud grid
|
|
June 19, 2009, 04:59 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
From my experience with interFoam I can tell that sometimes slightly skewed hex cells give rise to problems with the pressure.
This may be an explanation for the pressure field in proximity of the bend. Using corrected schemes for snGrad solved the problem within interFoam. Maybe you even have to increase the value of nonOrthogonalCorrectors, which triggers the number of correction loops within the solution of the momentum equation. But this is not explaining the pressure region at the outlet.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
June 19, 2009, 07:19 |
decoupling problem
|
#10 |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
Is this decoupling problem?
|
|
June 19, 2009, 07:47 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
I don't understand your question. What do you mean with 'decoupling problem'?
And what happend to your domain in the first picture?
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
June 19, 2009, 08:31 |
|
#12 | |
New Member
Yijin Li
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
I changed relTol from 0 to 0.05 in fvSolution, than the first picture is the result. I found that there are some fluctuating of pressure near the outlet boundary. I think that something wrong with pressure and velocity. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Default domain | jaho | CFX | 5 | February 16, 2014 00:00 |
air bubble is disappear increasing time using vof | xujjun | CFX | 9 | June 9, 2009 07:59 |
CFX Solver Memory Error | mike | CFX | 1 | March 19, 2008 07:22 |
CHT Problem - Domain Imbalance | Parthipan | CFX | 5 | September 11, 2007 10:13 |
rotating domain in rotating domain, different axis | Robert Stringer | CFX | 3 | December 4, 2006 07:04 |