CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

HeatFlux in buoyantBoussinesq

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 16, 2010, 15:41
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: M├╝nchen, Bavarian, Deutschland
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 10
ubaid is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by David_010 View Post
Hi ubaid

snGrad is the gradient normal to a surface. The gradient term can be evaluated in different manners, and in the case of the temperature gradient at the wall, the heat flux expression q=k(DT/DX) employs the gradient normal to that wall, so snGrad is the correct way.

I suggest you to take a look to the Programmers Guide, I think it explains this better than me.

Hope it helps, regards

Hallo David,

Thanks a lot, i got what you meant. I will look at manual closely.

Best Regards,
ubaid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 8, 2011, 10:35
New Member
Sarah K÷hler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Leoben
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 9
sarahk is on a distinguished road
Hey Foamers,

i just tried the turbulentHeatFluxTemperature bc in the buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam tutorial case with OF-1.7.1.
I exchanged all the kappaEff with alphaEff. Its reading all the files, starts the time loop and breaks up directly. i got a:

request for volScalarField unifrom from objectRegistry region0 failed
available objects ot type volScalarField are

do i need to add a field in createFields?
Thought its ok, when i just add a value in the 0/T file ...

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance!

sarahk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2011, 09:20
Senior Member
Anne Gerdes
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 168
Rep Power: 9
Anne Lincke is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,
can someone explain me why OF1.7 still uses

HTML Code:
- ghf*fvc::snGrad(rhok)*mesh.magSf()
instead of

HTML Code:
fvc::interpolate(rhok)*(g & mesh.Sf())
as it was used in the previous version OF1.6.
I do not understand why the gradient of the densitiy is used while in the equations I find in literature it has to be just the densitiy multiplied with the constant g.
Can someone help me? Is this still a bug or do I overlook something?
Also in the Wiki-Link
they use the interpolated density instead of the surface normal gradient.
Anne Lincke is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wall with fixed heatFlux boundary condition Martin Lorenz (Lorenz) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 32 August 29, 2017 18:36
wallHeatFlux BC not constant after restart eelcovv OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 26 May 24, 2011 23:11

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15.