CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Reflecting outlet BC using rhoPisoFoam

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2010, 10:26
Default Reflecting outlet BC using rhoPisoFoam
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
morgoth54 is on a distinguished road

I have a small problem using rhoPisoFoam.

I want to simulate the flow through a nozzle exiting in a large free area. The flow is subsonic and I use air as a perfect gas with constant cp and constant transport properties.

However, it seems to be a problem with my outlet boundary conditions. In the beginning, the result seem to be good, the convergence is ok. However, by the time the flow reaches the outlet, it looks like the flow is reflected backward. So a high pressure wave "flows" back to the nozzle exit.

I attached the 0 folder and the systems folder to this post.

If someone has any suggesting, the help would be appreciated. If you need more information, please ask.

Thanks for any help.

Attached Files
File Type: zip (10.5 KB, 32 views)
morgoth54 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2010, 13:40
Default change boundary condition
kiran Ambilpur
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 9
kiran is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to kiran
change boundary condition in U file

oulet to zeroGradient
and dont fix any value.

internal field as (0,0,0).

and i dont know why your pressure's are s high.

why k values r so less. better you start with some good guess.

try with this and once check your pressures

hope it gives solves your problem
kiran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2010, 09:43
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
morgoth54 is on a distinguished road

thank you for your reply. I will try to initials with the internal U field with (0,0,0).

Sorry, I forgot to write in my first post:
1. The mesh is ok (check with checkMesh).
2. I simulate without turbulence (at the moment), that is why the k and epsilon field are a bit wrong.

I'm not sure what you mean about the U field. Do you mean to use fixed values for the pressure and zero gradients for the velocity? I already tried using a total pressure inlet and a fixed pressure outlet. However, the problem is still the same.

The pressure is so high because in the next step, I want to simulate a piece of equipment which is operated under these conditions.

Is it possible that the error might be related to the fvShemes I used?

morgoth54 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2010, 17:07
Senior Member
Nilesh Rane
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 9
nileshjrane is on a distinguished road
I am also facing very similar problem. Still havent find any solution though.

Well, u should use U outlet BC as zeroGradient. Sure you wouldn't be expecting reversed flow at a nozzle exit, so zeroGradient is appropriate BC.

Also i dont think your turbulence values are low..You are specifying 5% turb intensity, its not low at all....

I think fvschemes look far as my experience is concerned, fvschemes is not issue for the pressure waves. Also try if relaxation factors help or not.

u could also try waveTransmissive BC at outlet.

just in case you have found any solution, please post it here.
Imagination is more important than knowledge..
nileshjrane is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compressible flow, no data at the outlet mireis FLUENT 6 September 3, 2015 02:10
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 Joseph CFX 14 April 20, 2010 15:45
uncertain on model outlet definition mactech001 CFX 0 February 10, 2010 03:03
VOF Outlet boundary condition in cfd - ace JM Main CFD Forum 0 December 15, 2006 09:07
Impinging Jet. Outlet Boundary Condition Vincent Main CFD Forum 0 December 16, 2003 11:49

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31.