
[Sponsors] 
November 10, 2010, 15:39 
can anyone explian the logic behind defining the vertices

#1 
Member
Sandeep
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 8 
I am not able to figure out the direction chosen for defining the vertices in the example figure 5.6 explained in this following link.
http://www.openfoam.com/docs/user/blockMesh.php may be they have not defined the lengths of the edges and now am not able to figure out the lengths from the vertices definition. Thanks for the help Sandeep 

November 10, 2010, 17:33 

#2 
Senior Member
David Gaden
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 14 
Hi Sandeep,
Your question isn't very clear. I'm not sure what you are asking... If it's about finding the length of the edges, then look at example blockMeshDict files. The points are listed first. The order in which they appear is their number. Code:
(0 0 0) // point 0 (0 0.1 0) // point 1 (0.1 0.1 0) // point 2 (0.1 0 0) // point 3 Lastly, you should pay attention to the axis directions defined (shown as x1, x2 and x3 in the diagram). The simpleGrading or edgeGrading lists are based on these axes, not a global coordinate system. Is that what you wanted to know? 

November 10, 2010, 19:08 

#3  
Member
Sandeep
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
Hi david, Thanks for the reply. Its my bad that i am not clear in my question. My question is that vertices for the figure 5.6(single block) are mentioned under the section 5.3.1.1 at 'the vertices' in the link i have sent. Now that am not able to visualize the same figure with the defined vertices. Also there are no lengths defined in the figure 5.6 and how the vertices were defined by taking 0.1 in one direction and 1 in another direction etc. Also for some vertices he has taken ve value which looks impossible for the figure. the vertices you have sent do not match with the list in the link. i wonder if you are refering to the same figure?? Also i want to know the x y and z directions are same as x1, x2 and x3 directions in the figure 5.6? Thanks and regards sandeep 

November 11, 2010, 01:18 

#4 
Senior Member
Nakul
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: India
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 8 
Hi,
The vertices that have been defined in the link are defined correctly. x1, x2 and x3 can be assumed as x,y,z directions respectively. The lengths are arbitary here as this is just an illustration of defining vertices in blockMeshDict. In an actual case the choice of vertices would be detrmined by the dimensions of your domain. Besides that figure is not an exact representation of those vertices. You can safely assume the figure to be a representation to understand the procedure. If you are having trouble visualising these vertices try making your own rough figure on paper. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Internal walls of zero thickness  anger  OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh  22  December 15, 2015 03:06 
[ICEM] Specifying Periodic Vertices Causes Strange Problem  Josh  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  5  July 19, 2011 16:09 
[ICEM] Specifying Periodic Vertices Causes Mesh Overlap  Josh  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  10  July 8, 2010 02:39 
correcting double vertices  Tom  CDadapco  3  October 3, 2006 19:18 
vread not storing all vertices  Chris  CDadapco  6  May 18, 2005 02:50 