# Boundary Condition: Antisymmetric periodicity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 4, 2011, 10:16 Boundary Condition: Antisymmetric periodicity #1 New Member   Jacob Jensen Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 Has anyone come across boundary conditions in OpenFoam that impose anti-symmetric periodicity … An anti-symmetric periodic boundary condition is just like periodic boundary conditions only swapped or mirrored … i.e. u(x, y)=u(x+L, ymax-y) v(x, y)=-v(x+L, ymax-y) p(x, y)=p(x+L, ymax-y) rather then (pure periodicity): u(x, y)=u(x+L, y) v(x, y)=v(x+L, y) p(x, y)=p(x+L, y) here u =velocity in x, v = velocity in y, p=pressure, x and y coordinates where y[0, ymax]. The boundary condition is described in “ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SYMMETRIC AND ANTISYMMETRIC PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW” by GUUS SEGAL, KEES VUIK AND KEES KASSELS. Last edited by Jacob Jensen; March 7, 2011 at 09:40.

 August 17, 2014, 05:35 #2 New Member   Oleg Rogozin Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 Cyclic boundary conditions can be used in this case.

December 1, 2014, 13:28
#3
New Member

Fredo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
 Originally Posted by olegrog Cyclic boundary conditions can be used in this case.
Hello,

yes they can, but then you need a cyclic geometry.

Let me explain my case :
I have a cubic domain which describe a porous media (liquid and solid). Only the liquid phase is meshed. Since the media is pretty random, the faces of my cube do not have the same mesh.
To apply a cyclic boundary conditions (because that's what I want), I mirror the mesh in the x, y and finally z directions.
I have then a cube 8 times bigger than my initial cube with all the same faces.
I can then use cyclic boundary.

But, I compute 7 times something I am not really interessted in.
If I could apply antisymmetric periodicity, that would save a lot a time.

Do you have any suggestions ?

Fred.

 December 1, 2014, 17:32 #4 Senior Member   Cyprien Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Stanford University Posts: 262 Rep Power: 11 Hi Fredo, What I do in this case: I had a thin layer of cells surrounding my domain. Like that I can impose cyclic boundary conditions. The two main problems when mirroring the domain: 1) it significantly increases the number of cells, 2) it biases the anisotropy (primordial for permeability estimation!).

 December 2, 2014, 04:29 #5 New Member   Fredo Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 3 Rep Power: 5 Hi Cyp, thank you for this quick reply. Your solution seems very relevant ! Did you quantify the errors induced by this thin layer. My media is not very percolating so I fear that all the fluid goes through this thin layer. I will try and keep you updated. Fred.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post HMR CFX 5 October 10, 2016 05:57 yating9901 FLUENT 3 June 28, 2010 12:26 CFDtoy FLUENT 6 February 13, 2007 06:51 Peiyong FLUENT 1 November 10, 2006 12:44 sam FLUENT 2 July 20, 2003 02:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17.