Nagano-Tagawa as low-Re k-epsilon model

tH3f0rC3 · April 13, 2011, 10:21

Hi,

does someone know if it is possible to model an OpenFoam case with the Nagano-Tagawa low-Re k-epsilon turbulence model?
I still have looked the OF user doc, but it isn't listed there.
I still have read here in the forum that Launder-Sharma is available in OF. But I want to use Nagano-Tagawa because of its developement for heat-transfer.

Best Regards,
tH3f0rC3

tH3f0rC3 · April 15, 2011, 03:22

Ok, it seems like there are "only" these turbulence models available.

Best Regards,
tH3f0rC3

tH3f0rC3 · April 19, 2011, 02:23

Hi,

does someone know it if is right to set k and epsilon to zero when using a low-Re turbulence model, as it is described here?

Best Regards,
tH3f0rC3

daveatstyacht · May 6, 2011, 20:45

tH3f0rC3,
Normally k is set to 0 at the wall for all k-e models that I know of with low Re functions (along with nu_t). For epsilon it depends on the particular version you are using and how it is applied by the solver. For launder-sharma the value of epsilon at the wall is the term 2*nu*(d(sqrt(k)/dy)^2 (sometimes also referred to as epsilon_wall though not the epsilon_wall of your link). This is at least the value used by the solvers in combination with epsilon_tilda where epsilon= epsilon_tilda + epsilon_wall. It is not clear to me which value you are setting in OF for specifying epsilon at the wall. If you are setting just the value of epsilon_tilda it should be 0 at the wall as appears to be indicated by your link as "epsilon_wall". I am not very familiar with the Nagano-Tagawa formulation, but it appears you specify 1/2 half the value of that term above as the value of epsilon at the wall. Essentially the purpose of the dampening terms is to prevent the numerical singularities that exist in the epsilon equation as y->0 from blowing up the simulation as k->0. Hope this helps, rather than muddles things for you.

Dave

vkrastev · May 7, 2011, 04:09

The OpenFOAM implementation of the Launder-Sharma low-Re model solves for epsilonTilda: thus, the correct BC at the wall is epsilon = 0 (which practically means a very low value, such as for instance 10^-10)

V.

April 13, 2011, 10:21	Nagano-Tagawa as low-Re k-epsilon model	#1
tH3f0rC3 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 158 Rep Power: 16	Hi, does someone know if it is possible to model an OpenFoam case with the Nagano-Tagawa low-Re k-epsilon turbulence model? I still have looked the OF user doc, but it isn't listed there. I still have read here in the forum that Launder-Sharma is available in OF. But I want to use Nagano-Tagawa because of its developement for heat-transfer. Best Regards, tH3f0rC3

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models	Jade M	Main CFD Forum	40	January 27, 2023 07:18
Low Reynolds number k-E Turbulent Model	Sohail	FLUENT	19	July 16, 2020 14:08
Epsilon boundary condition for walls in LamBremhorst LowRe model	maruthamuthu_venkatraman	OpenFOAM	1	April 21, 2019 06:25
Low Inlet Turb. Intensity - SST model not converge	Pete	CFX	0	November 12, 2005 01:26
a low Re number model for impinging jets	mahesh prakash	Main CFD Forum	14	September 3, 1999 16:40

April 15, 2011, 03:22		#2
tH3f0rC3 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 158 Rep Power: 16	Ok, it seems like there are "only" these turbulence models available. Best Regards, tH3f0rC3

April 19, 2011, 02:23		#3
tH3f0rC3 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 158 Rep Power: 16	Hi, does someone know it if is right to set k and epsilon to zero when using a low-Re turbulence model, as it is described here? Best Regards, tH3f0rC3

May 6, 2011, 20:45		#4
daveatstyacht Senior Member Dave Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 100 Rep Power: 16	tH3f0rC3, Normally k is set to 0 at the wall for all k-e models that I know of with low Re functions (along with nu_t). For epsilon it depends on the particular version you are using and how it is applied by the solver. For launder-sharma the value of epsilon at the wall is the term 2nu(d(sqrt(k)/dy)^2 (sometimes also referred to as epsilon_wall though not the epsilon_wall of your link). This is at least the value used by the solvers in combination with epsilon_tilda where epsilon= epsilon_tilda + epsilon_wall. It is not clear to me which value you are setting in OF for specifying epsilon at the wall. If you are setting just the value of epsilon_tilda it should be 0 at the wall as appears to be indicated by your link as "epsilon_wall". I am not very familiar with the Nagano-Tagawa formulation, but it appears you specify 1/2 half the value of that term above as the value of epsilon at the wall. Essentially the purpose of the dampening terms is to prevent the numerical singularities that exist in the epsilon equation as y->0 from blowing up the simulation as k->0. Hope this helps, rather than muddles things for you. Dave

May 7, 2011, 04:09		#5
vkrastev Senior Member Vesselin Krastev Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: University of Tor Vergata, Rome Posts: 368 Rep Power: 21	The OpenFOAM implementation of the Launder-Sharma low-Re model solves for epsilonTilda: thus, the correct BC at the wall is epsilon = 0 (which practically means a very low value, such as for instance 10^-10) V.