Not all fields written as part of solution

adhiraj · April 22, 2011, 18:46

Hey all,
I am simulating a laminar diffusion flame using a solver that is built on the lines of reactingFoam in version 1.7.1. I have added some new fields for calculations, like the diffusivities, viscosities, mole fractions, etc. But I find that while running, some fields are not being written to the solution, even when I initialize them like this:

Code:

mu_
(
    IOobject
    (
        "mu",
        mesh.time().timeName(),
        mesh,
        IOobject::NO_READ,
        IOobject::AUTO_WRITE
    ),
    mesh,
    dimensionedScalar("zero",dimensionSet(1,-1,-1,0,0,0,0),0 )
)

I am using this initializer as part of a constructor of an object where I have this defines. Strangely, some other objects (volScalarFields) initialized in this way get written properly.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

nimasam · April 23, 2011, 04:54

i guess you are going to define ur variable twice!
mu_ maybe is defined in another file too

adhiraj · April 23, 2011, 11:16

Thanks for replying. Actually I managed to fix the issue by changning the string
"mu" to "Mu" in the function call. Maybe it was in conflict with a different variable of same name in the IOdict .

April 22, 2011, 18:46	Not all fields written as part of solution	#1
adhiraj Senior Member Adhiraj Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Karnataka, India Posts: 187 Rep Power: 16	Hey all, I am simulating a laminar diffusion flame using a solver that is built on the lines of reactingFoam in version 1.7.1. I have added some new fields for calculations, like the diffusivities, viscosities, mole fractions, etc. But I find that while running, some fields are not being written to the solution, even when I initialize them like this: Code: mu_ ( IOobject ( "mu", mesh.time().timeName(), mesh, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::AUTO_WRITE ), mesh, dimensionedScalar("zero",dimensionSet(1,-1,-1,0,0,0,0),0 ) ) I am using this initializer as part of a constructor of an object where I have this defines. Strangely, some other objects (volScalarFields) initialized in this way get written properly. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
grid dependancy	gueynard a.	Main CFD Forum	19	June 27, 2014 21:22
Exact solution of Burgers equation	mcaro	Main CFD Forum	3	January 25, 2011 06:46
Steady solution from Transient simulations	wawa	FLUENT	2	November 9, 2010 17:44
Unsteady solution	Christophe	FLUENT	0	August 11, 2006 11:13
Wall functions	Abhijit Tilak	Main CFD Forum	6	February 5, 1999 01:16

April 23, 2011, 04:54		#2
nimasam Senior Member Nima Samkhaniani Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tehran, Iran Posts: 1,268 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 25	i guess you are going to define ur variable twice! mu_ maybe is defined in another file too

April 23, 2011, 11:16		#3
adhiraj Senior Member Adhiraj Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Karnataka, India Posts: 187 Rep Power: 16	Thanks for replying. Actually I managed to fix the issue by changning the string "mu" to "Mu" in the function call. Maybe it was in conflict with a different variable of same name in the IOdict .