Which Foam for vortex shedding problem
Hi all,
if I were interested in modeling vortex shedding behind a cylinder in incompressible flow, which Foam is best to use? The Re will vary from 60 to 10,000. Thanks, Maddy. |
You can start with icoFoam, the basic solver for incompressible flow. A more important question is the turbulence model you will use. There are numerous models, you can find more info on http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbulence_modeling, but I suggest you also find a good textbook.
|
icoFoam for lower Reynolds number, pisoFoam or pimpleFoam for higher Reynolds number. However, have in mind that in this Reynolds number range (up to 10000) the flow exhibits a mixed laminar-turbulent behavior which is quite difficult to capture properly with standard RANS turbulence models. I have some experience at higher Reynolds numbers (from 1E05 to 3.6E06) and for such a flow regime some unsteady RANS models do a pretty good job in predicting vortex shedding frequencies and time-averaged drag values.
Regards V. |
Which Foam for vortex shedding problem
hi all,
Use icoFoam for Re ranging from 0-300 and turbFoam or pimpleFoam for Re ranging from 300-20000 with SA Model or k-epsilon. Regards NAVEEN |
hi all
I am interested in vortex shedding at high Reynolds numbers (20.000 to 90.000). I found out that the solver turbfoam is no longer available in OF versions 1.6 and newer (I work with OF 1.7.x).
best Uli |
Both icoFoam and pimpleFoam can do simulations, and you can chose from a whole range of turbulence models in constant/turbulenceProperties.
|
hi all,
since icoFoam is a solver for laminar flows I did simulations with pimpleFoam and pisoFoam, which produced similar results. For any further suggestions see http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/mai...frequency.html maybe we can continue the vortex shedding topic there. Uli |
Hi, I am trying to simulate flow passing over an airfoil with a Reynolds number 60000 , I am modeling it using RANS with SA turbulence model. I am running it using pisoFoam solver and by checking the results, so far it's given good results but the problem is that it is very slow. I wanted to increase the speed of simulations and I read in one of the topics that using pimpleFoam since we can go for higher Courant number is an option. It gave the results very fast but when I check it , there was no vortex shedding and it looked like an average results.
Do you have any idea how I can set the pimpleFoam in order to capture vortex shedding? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02. |