|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Will I break mass conservation law if i do so? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Hi Foamers,
In alphaEqn.H (like in the solver bubbleFoam or twoPhaseEulerFoam) I have to make sure alpha is strictly in [0, 0.523] after each Code:
alphaEqn.solve(); Code:
alpha = max(0,alpha); alpha = min(0.523,alpha); So far I have realized it may break the mass continuity if I do so. So I considered if I should create a "packingLimiter" as it is in solver twoPhaseEulerFoam. Thanks // Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
| interDyMFoam mass conservation issues - dam break tutorial | kmooney | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 1, 2010 15:23 |
| Mass conservation law violation in stationary case | vitmalin | CFX | 3 | September 3, 2007 14:32 |
| Mass conservation law violation in stationary case | vitmalin | FLUENT | 0 | August 27, 2007 04:07 |
| Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |