|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi all;
what's the difference between icoFoam and simpleFoam run with turbulence model? Thank you! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,268
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 ![]() |
icoFoam: Transient solver for incompressible, laminar flow of Newtonian fluids.
simpleFoam: Steady-state solver for incompressible, turbulent flow pisoFoam: Transient solver for incompressible flow. Turbulence modelling is generic, i.e. laminar, RAS or LES may be selected. look in source, you can find description for each solver! ![]() if you compare them, you will find little differences for examples: in simpleFoam in momentum equation fvm::ddt(U) is omited because it solves for steady-state or in icoFoam friction term is like that fvm::laplacian(nu, U) which does not count turbulence effect |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Thank you!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pimpleFoam vs simpleFoam vs pisoFoam vs icoFoam? | phsieh2005 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 45 | March 22, 2021 09:14 |
SimpleFoam as Newtonian laminar flow solver | titio | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | March 8, 2013 04:44 |
Different results with icoFoam and simpleFoam..why??? | nileshjrane | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | September 13, 2010 15:08 |
coadles, simplefoam...icoFoam...channelOodles | mgolbs | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | December 1, 2009 03:15 |
Kubuntu uses dash breaks All scripts in tutorials | platopus | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | April 15, 2008 07:52 |