CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Solvers for reacting flows

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 8, 2011, 10:51
Default Solvers for reacting flows
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 15
megacrout is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I have to solve different cases of reacting flows (through a pipe) but - being new to OpenFOAM - I do not know what solver(s) I have to use.

Here are the parameters I have as input (several different cases):

- Empty pipe or filled with a porous media (catalyst)
- Adiabatic or isotermal reaction conditions
- All three possible flow types (laminar, intermediate or turbulent)
- Premixed stream
- Scale: dm-range (say, 20cm in diameter and long enough to reach spatial steady-state but this is not critical to me)
- No moving boundaries

- Up to 20 species (reactant, inert, product)
- Up to 10 simultaneous reactions (not only combustions)
- Simple or combined (parallel and/or chain) reactions
- Fast or slow reactions
- Arrhenius or more complicated reaction models (e.g. Langmuir-Hinshelwood)

And the results I need:
- Velocity
- Temperature
- Pressure
- Concentration (reactants, products and inert species) profiles.

If you´re confused because of the number of parameters I wrote down, here are the parameters of the first case I am trying to solve:

"physics": Empty pipe, premixed gases, laminar, adiabatic, no moving boundaries.
"chemistry": 2 reactants (CH4, O2), 1 inert (N2), 2 products (CO2, H2O), i.e. 1 simple reaction described by Arrhenius kinetics.

I am currently using reactingFoam but I can´t justify this choice and I don´t think it will do it for all the cases.

Can you tell me what solver I have to use depending on the system and, if not, what parameters to look at/for to choose it?
Let me know if you need further data to properly answer my question.

Thanks in advance.


Last edited by megacrout; July 11, 2011 at 08:58.
megacrout is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2011, 10:23
Franco Marra
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Napoli - Italy
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 17
francescomarra is on a distinguished road
Dear Tibo,

sorry for my late answer.

I think you correctly choose to use reactingFoam to solve your first case.

There are some documents available in internet to find some indications about the use of OpenFOAM for premixed flames propagation.

One is the excellent website of Hani Kurser:
Having a look to the projects of former students, you probably will find useful indications.

Another very interesting report by Christian Andersen and Niels E. L. Nielsen is available at the following link:
It contains also a description of the main OpenFOAM solvers for premixed combustion.

About your physical problem, despite the apparent simplicity of the configuration (a pipe open on both sides filled with an flammable mixture) the simulation could be not so easy. The main reason is that the laminar flame propagation is highly sensitive to the several disturbances that can be observed in the tube, depending on the actual boundary conditions (are you fixing a mass flow rate ?), tube length, and the flame (in)stability. As a result, different flame shapes (and therefore different flame propagation velocities and global combustion rates) can be observed, up to the point that symmetry can be lost.
It could be useful to select a configuration at the extremities of the tube that, at least initially, allows to select well defined boundary conditions.

Now, depending upon the phenomena you need to explore (flame quenching, flame shape, flame acceleration, etc.) you need to include a proper combustion model.

My best regards,

francescomarra is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2011, 03:30
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 15
megacrout is on a distinguished road
Hi Francesco,

Thanks for your reply (again) and for your advise. I greatly appreciate it.

I had already found Andersen and Nielsen´s report as well as Chalmers website. They´re indeed pretty interesting but I did not spend a lot of time on any of them yet. Following your advise, I´ll have a closer look at them.

I´d be glad to read the answer of any Foamer opening this page.

Thanks in advance.

megacrout is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2012, 12:53
Default openFOAM for Catalysis
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 13
slakhapa is on a distinguished road
Hello guys, I'm a chemical engineer, with focus in heterogeneous catalysis. While doing some internet search, I came across this thread. I see that you have, in the past, tried to develop a solver for catalytic converter or similar applications. I have just started looking into openFOAM for my modeling application and would really appreciate some help from you. If possible, I would really like to understand what solver you started with and was it successful. Would you be able to share your solver file for a test case? If not, I would still be interested in getting some help from you. That would be much appreciated. Let me know if you have any questions.

My email is

Thank you in advance.
Satish, PhD
slakhapa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2013, 05:35
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chennai
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
shijin is on a distinguished road
Can anyone tell me what solver I should use for steady in-compressible laminar non-premixed combustion ?
shijin is offline   Reply With Quote


reacting flow, reaction solver, solver

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Temperature loss in compressible solvers in high speed flows vkrastev OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 June 16, 2018 07:10
SIMPLE pressure correction in compressible flows Maarten de Jong Main CFD Forum 7 April 30, 2012 02:23
Reaction solvers megacrout OpenFOAM 5 July 8, 2011 10:54
Why do most of the compressible solvers diverge at flows > Ma 5? Alan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 16, 2010 19:28
Modeling Free Surface Flows Elliot Schwartz Main CFD Forum 5 August 25, 1998 21:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:20.