
[Sponsors] 
October 19, 2011, 09:17 
total energy and mass balances

#1 
Member
Tibo
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 8 
Sponsored Links
1) Total mass balance: sum Yi = 1. Is it checked through Y[inertIndex] = scalar(1)  Yt; at the end of YEqn.H? This looks a bit tricky to me as it only modifies the (total) mass fraction of the inert species, it does not correct the computed values. This means the total mass fraction of the inert species would be altered if the computation of the other Yi´s is wrong. What does the next line : Y[inertIndex].max(0.0); do? 2) As for the total energy, I am actually not quite sure of how it is computed in reactingFoam. Is it e = h  p/rho + u^2/2 ? And where is the total energy conservation being checked? Is it in thermo.correct() in hsEqn? 3) Finally, the sensible enthalpy is computed through hsEqn in reactingFoam and the chemical one as hc = h(Tstd) through janafThermo. However, janaf also computes (or at least can compute) h(T) and then the sensible enthalpy as hs = h  hc. So, is h being computed as hs + hc? In any case, where is it computed? Thx for your help and time. Tibo 

Sponsored Links 
October 19, 2011, 19:50 

#2 
Senior Member
Adhiraj
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland, United States
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 8 
I can answer parts of the questions you raised.
1. Yes, it does not check any mass conservation, but uses the mass conservation condition as a constraint. If there is an error in any of the calculated Y's the inert specie will get modified. The next line Y[i].max(0) sets all values in the Y[i] field to non negative ones. You know from the physical nature of the problem that Y[i] has to be positive or zero. Yet during numerical calculations this condition often needs to be explicitly enforced. Hence the line. 2. ReactingFOAM solves for the transport equation for enthalpy. In version 1.7 it is the sensible enthalpy hs. There is no in built check for energy conservation. The thermo.correct() call goes through a series of functions and then updates the temperature and other properties based on the hs values that have been calculated. Hope that helps. 

October 20, 2011, 06:51 

#3 
Member
Tibo
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Adhiraj,
Thanks for your reply, again. It does help, indeed. If the energy conservation is not checked, there actually is no need to compute h. Still, can you maybe tell me if h includes the kinetic energy in reactingFoam (i.e. e = h  p/rho instead of e = h  p/rho + u^2/2) as it sometimes is the case? And your answers raised a new question: I can't remember what is the advantage of the splitting of enthalpy into chemical and sensitive terms. Can you help me? I only vaguely remember something about the separation of the computation for reactions and from the one for transport but I can't find the details anymore. Tibo 

October 20, 2011, 09:09 

#4  
Senior Member
Adhiraj
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland, United States
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
Quote:
On the other hand, there are some issues with diffusion flames that are exacerbated by the use of the h equation. In this case, use of the hs equation somewhat masks the problem, though it is not eliminated. 

Tags 
energy balance, mass balance, reactingfoam 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Mass and energy source  evaporation  neilduffy1024  ANSYS  4  July 16, 2013 23:50 
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7  Joseph  CFX  14  April 20, 2010 15:45 
Mass and Energy residue  gxue  Main CFD Forum  0  October 14, 2009 14:57 
Mass transfer Term in Mixture Energy Equation  CFDtoy  Main CFD Forum  0  July 3, 2008 16:14 
What is the total energy for incompressible fluid?  Harry Dong  Main CFD Forum  12  February 4, 2006 01:55 
Sponsored Links 