CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/)
-   -   High order convective schemes (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/94447-high-order-convective-schemes.html)

 Amir November 16, 2011 09:01

High order convective schemes

Hi,

Can anyone suggest a reliable high order scheme for convective term of a tensor equation in which convective term is much more dominated? I examine upwind, limitedLinear, Gamma, SFCD, QUICK and Minmod but the results change with increasing grid resolution and it becomes unreasonable for my simple 2D geometry. :confused:

 pbohorquez November 16, 2011 11:23

Hilary and Henry Weller implemented new polynomial-fit higher-order schemes (quadraticLinearFit, quadraticLinearPureUpwindFit, among others) in OF versions >= 1.6. For further details on the discretisation schemes see their papers:

However, spatial discretisation in OF is formally based on Taylor series including only the first two terms of the expansion. So I think that we are limited to 2nd order accuray in space. Recall that higher order schemes are difficult to be implemented in arbitrary polyhedral meshes.

Regards,
patricio.

 Amir November 16, 2011 13:14

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pbohorquez (Post 332346) Hilary and Henry Weller implemented new polynomial-fit higher-order schemes (quadraticLinearFit, quadraticLinearPureUpwindFit, among others) in OF versions >= 1.6. For further details on the discretisation schemes see their papers: http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~sws02hs/publications/ http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~sws02hs/AtmosFOAM/ However, spatial discretisation in OF is formally based on Taylor series including only the first two terms of the expansion. So I think that we are limited to 2nd order accuray in space. Recall that higher order schemes are difficult to be implemented in arbitrary polyhedral meshes. Regards, patricio.
Dear Patricio,

Thanks for your reply; certainly I'll check these schemes but before I take a look over these paper, do you know about their order or stability?
BTW, we have also SFCD as a second order scheme with good stability but it is said that it's very diffusive; do you have any experience with? because my convective term is very large so I prefer more diffusive schemes.

Bests,

 pbohorquez November 16, 2011 15:01

Hi Amir, the schemes are high order with exponent very close to 2.00. Curious, for convective dominated problem on simple geometries I usually prefer low diffusive WENO schemes (order >=5). Best wishes, patricio

 Amir November 16, 2011 16:29

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pbohorquez (Post 332397) Hi Amir, the schemes are high order with exponent very close to 2.00. Curious, for convective dominated problem on simple geometries I usually prefer low diffusive WENO schemes (order >=5). Best wishes, patricio
Really!? I thought such high order schemes may lead to instability in convection dominated cases! Is there any WENO schemes in OpenFOAM? :)

 pbohorquez November 17, 2011 07:02

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Amir (Post 332405) Really!? I thought such high order schemes may lead to instability in convection dominated cases! Is there any WENO schemes in OpenFOAM? :)
Hi Amir, WENO works with success without introducing stability difficulties (Shu, 2009). Unfortunately, OF does not implement this family of numerical schemes that will improve the result of many solvers (e.g. interFoam)

C.-W. Shu, High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems , SIAM Review, v51 (2009), pp.82-126.

 Amir November 17, 2011 09:11

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pbohorquez (Post 332480) Hi Amir, WENO works with success without introducing stability difficulties (Shu, 2009). Unfortunately, OF does not implement this family of numerical schemes that will improve the result of many solvers (e.g. interFoam) C.-W. Shu, High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems , SIAM Review, v51 (2009), pp.82-126.

 1/153 February 6, 2013 18:01

Hi, what's your experience, among these higher order schemes, quadraticLinearFit, quadraticLinearPureUpwindFit, MUSCL, etc. which works better if I want to use higher order schemes for better accuracy? Say my flow is convection dominated.

Thanks a lot!

 idefix May 16, 2013 03:15

Hello,

I hope itīs correct to ask this question here.
In Jasakīs PhD thesis I found the following sentences:

Quote:
 For good accuracy, it is necessary for the order of the discretisation to be equal to or higher than the order of the equation that is being discretised
(page 77)

Can anyone explain me why it is so?

Thanks
Idefix

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37.