|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Terry Jordan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
When writing my reader should I be visualizing t=0?
I have been but then I looked at tutorials/icoFoam/cavityClipped and it is from 0.5 to 0.6 seems incorrect to visualize 0, 0.5 and 0.6. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Terry Jordan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Nevermind, I should visualize 0 if it is included in the range. here startTime is 0.5 so I should not visualize it.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] paraFoam vs paraView builtin reader for lagrangian solvers | Yann | ParaView | 2 | September 9, 2017 05:32 |
cannot visualize wingtip vortecies, gets damped and streamlined | Erlendhj | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | April 24, 2017 03:28 |
Visualize checkMesh output with Paraview | Horus | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 29, 2012 11:51 |
VisIt OpenFOAM reader | timbojones | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | November 5, 2011 03:02 |
[OpenFOAM] Paraview Windows VTK Reader | trex930 | ParaView | 0 | November 3, 2010 19:31 |