CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Phoenics

relaxation factors adjust

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 12, 2003, 04:40
Default relaxation factors adjust
Posts: n/a
i am engaging with the numerical simulation of combustion with phoenics 3.4. the model are as follows: pressure and solution;enthalpy(total),kemodl,radiosity,3-gas mixing.the convergence process is not satisfied,i want to ask for to set the relaxtion factors for every variable. the iteration is in accessory. i set the relaxation factors: P1 -1.000E-01 U1 8.000E-04 V1 8.000E-05 W1 8.000E-06 KE 2.000E-04 EP 2.000E-04 H1 6.000E-03 PRPS -1.000E-01 FUEL -3.456E-02 TMP1 -1.000E-02 PROD -1.000E-01 OXID -3.456E-02 MIXF 2.000E-03 WCRT -1.000E+00 VCRT -1.000E+00 UCRT -1.000E+00 SRAD 1.200E-03 RHO1 -3.000E-01 are these relaxation factors appropriate? how to adjust them. thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2003, 11:11
Default Re: relaxation factors adjust
CHAM Support
Posts: n/a
For combustion, it is advisable to set DENPCO=T which activates a form of the pressure correction that is suitable for strong variations in density.

The relaxation of density is often important, say 0.1 linear or even lower. For example, unless something is wrong, the case should converge if the density is relaxed very heavily, i.e. linear at 1e-3.

The pressure relexation should not be less than 0.1 but 0.3 is more advisable unless the grid is highly distorted. Your velocity inertial relaxation factors look too small unless the flow speed is quite high or the BFC is very non orthogonal.

It is best to use linear relexation on KE and EP, say 0.3 with the k-e source term linearisation option of KELIN=3. Your MIXF inertial relexation also looks too heavy because it will prevent the combustion from developing. There should be no relaxation on TMP1, PROD, OXID, FUEL (presuming that this is not solved because the flame sheet model is used), but rather these should be limited using VARMIN and VARMAX so as to prevent non-physical values occuring during the course of convergence. Likewise, a VARMIN of say 1.e-6 can be set on DEN1 to control the density.

It is best to confirm that the case does converge: (a) without radiation; and (b) without combustion (set heat of combustion to zero)?
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF / relaxation factors Phil FLUENT 0 July 11, 2007 21:44
Under Relaxation Factors venigall FLUENT 1 January 19, 2007 02:42
Under relaxation factors for LES Dinesh Main CFD Forum 0 March 26, 2006 06:25
Under relaxation factors MP FLUENT 3 January 30, 2005 11:11
relaxation factors zhujianguo Phoenics 1 August 5, 2003 06:17

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:11.