 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
April 29, 2005, 10:59
|
3.6vs3.5 HOCS convergence
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello Everybody,
I can't get convergence with any of the higher order convection schemes with v3.6 in low-speed flows around buildings. Is there a problem with the code or is it just me? I have relaxation tightened appropriately and v3.5 will converge perfectly with these parameters. I just can't see what is wrong. I would use 3.5 only I need to use some new options in 3.6flair. If anyone is interested, try to converge the (small) library case v407 with HOCS. Please englighten me Kind Regards |
|
|
||
|
April 29, 2005, 13:24
|
Re: 3.6vs3.5 HOCS convergence
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'd sure like to know the response to that one!
|
|
|
|
||
|
May 17, 2005, 07:25
|
Re: 3.6vs3.5 HOCS convergence
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There was a problem in the W-momentum. If you switch off HOS for W1 it should work, however this has been fixed via the first texter raising it as a support issue. If you mail in support we can provide you with a patch.
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| URF and convergence in natural convergence | Marie-Anne | Main CFD Forum | 11 | September 11, 2009 10:07 |
| P-1 convergence | dan | FLUENT | 0 | March 3, 2006 14:10 |
| convergence | vijay | FLUENT | 6 | February 1, 2006 03:04 |
| convergence | vijay | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 30, 2006 13:13 |
| too bad convergence | Davoche | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 20, 2005 05:08 |
Linear Mode
