# Which B.C. i should apply for this problem?urgent

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 January 6, 2006, 09:49 Which B.C. i should apply for this problem?urgent #1 raivish Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi to all, I am doing transient flow analysis on a pressure vessel.(More or less it is working as a surge tank).At the inlet of surge tank there is compressor. i.e .outlet of compressor is feeding flow to inlet of surge tank. Inlet known conditions at surge tank are velocity and outlet known conditions are velocity and pressure. Inlet velocity is 22 m/sec .and outlet velocity is 22 m/sec(cross sectional area is same) and pressure at outlet is 3.7 bar. Inlet pressure is not known. Now compressor is giving flow to surge tank inlet and this nature of flow is sinusoidal. i.e. pressure is varying sinusoidal at inlet. i.e pressure variation of flow is sinosodiual. The problem may be considered as compressible, but I have simulated it and found that there is little change in density and also little change in pressure .difference of pressure at inlet and outlet is more or less 0.05 bar. My query is which boundary condition I should apply? I have known conditions at inlet is only velocity (22 m/sec).and outlet known conditions is 22 m/sec and pressure is 3.7 bar. Second thing is whether I should consider the flow compressible or incompressible.? I am thing that following boundary conditiona should be applied. (1) For steady state velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet. (2) For unsteady state velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet. Now for unsteady anything should vary with respect to time. I have varying thing are pressure at inlet and outlet. but I only know pressure variation at outlet. So should I apply that at outlet. Whether it will create divergence flow at outlet due to varying nature or not? that's why I am afraid of that. Please reply me urgent if anybody knows. Thabkibng you all.
 Sponsored Links

 January 6, 2006, 19:12 Re: Which B.C. i should apply for this problem?urg #2 mick Guest   Posts: n/a If you set velocity at the inlet you by default set mass flow into the domain. The setting of pressure at the outlet is enough to describe the flow boundary conditions, but I do not believe that you will get a sinusoidal pressure field from this. You could try setting sinusoidal pressures at inlet and outlet , (the inlet being set as an outlet), and not using an inlet directly. or you could try using a compressible fluid and at the inlet for each time step define the density as sinusoidal (from rho=P/RT assuming this applies) with vel=22m/s and set the oulet to vary P sinusoidally over time too. I find it strange that if the inlet surges sinusoidally the velocity stays at 22m/s. Perhaps I misunderstand you.

 January 6, 2006, 19:22 Re: Which B.C. i should apply for this problem?urg #3 mick Guest   Posts: n/a Apologies for mistyping!! >>The setting of pressure at the outlet is enough to describe the flow boundary conditions, but I do not believe that you will get a sinusoidal pressure field from this. the above should have read: Along with the above, the additional setting of pressure at the outlet...............from this

 January 7, 2006, 03:18 Re: Which B.C. i should apply for this problem?urg #4 ravish Guest   Posts: n/a Thakx sir 4 ur suggestion.how d ou belive that velocity should change?because mass flow rate should remain same.because mass flow rate=density*area*velocity .now here if velocity is changing at each cross section then mass flow will also change.If surge is sinusodial then will velocity will also vary sinusodiall or not? regards ravish

 February 16, 2006, 05:35 Re: Which B.C. i should apply for this problem?urg #5 Mick Guest   Posts: n/a Yes I suspect velocity should change at each time step, so: 1/ Set velocity to vary sinusoidally at the inlet. So it changes for each time step. 2/ Also set the mass coming into the domain to be sinusoidal at the inlet, by using the applied velocity Coval(in1,p1,fixflu,rho*vel)-> this sets mass directly not pressure directly, the fixflu coefficient is responsible for this. 3/ set outlet pressure to what you know. Coval(out1,p1,1000.,3.7bar): this sets a condition for fixing Pressure. Of course do not write the 3.7bar literally. Also you may which to set PRESSO="a value" that takes a background pressure away form the calculations so that you can set the outlet pressure to ZERO. PHOENICS will then solve using relative pressure and the absolute pressure will be P1+PRESSO. P1 can set mass or pressure boundary conditions depending on the coefficient used. Read the lecture 'describing the basic functions behind PHOENICS' in the POLIS on-line: see Polis.html \phoenics\d_polis\d_lecs\GENERAL\INTRLECS.HTM

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Max FLUENT 1 September 24, 2010 20:30 raivish Siemens 2 January 11, 2006 04:00 raivish NUMECA 0 January 6, 2006 09:48 raivish FLUENT 0 January 6, 2006 09:48 raivish CFX 0 January 6, 2006 09:47

 Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top