CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing Software > Pointwise & Gridgen

Boundary Conditions -Unspecified not used by SU2

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 15, 2020, 15:44
Default Boundary Conditions -Unspecified not used by SU2
  #1
New Member
 
Mons
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 6
monika_1387 is on a distinguished road
Hi Guys,

I am trying to run 3D Mesh nozzle from Pointwise to SU2 simulation. Problem is in providing BC or markers to some surfaces because they are additional refinement connections or surfaces. So in SU2, we cannot leave them unspecified so need to give some boundary condition, so unable to run.Can someone help me with this why I am getting these as unspecified? I ran so many earlier meshes but never see this issue. But yes this time I made my grid from 2D to 3D. Since I am having hard time to get this Unspecified markers in SU2 to run. Appreciate your help!



Attached image of Grid showing in red color (shear layer exiting from nozzle lip). This grid area is just for additional refinement only.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capture.JPG (45.0 KB, 9 views)
monika_1387 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2020, 10:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
David Garlisch
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Fidelity Pointwise, Cadence Design Systems (Fort Worth, Texas Office)
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 14
dgarlisch is on a distinguished road
Normally, for 3D grids, you apply the BCs to the domains and apply the VCs to the blocks.

However, the Pointwise, SU2 CAE exporter only supports BCs. It does not support VCs. Also, the SU2 CAE exporter BCs only support the Unspecified BC type. This was a choice made by the SU2 team when the SU2 CAE Exporter plugin was created.

It is my understanding that you must set the SU2 BC type information outside of Pointwise using SU2 tools. This may be a question best asked on the SU2 support forum.

If you still consider this a Pointwise issue, please ZIP the pw file and attach it here.

Better yet, contact Pointwise support with your license information and they will help you for free.
dgarlisch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2020, 18:01
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Zach Davis
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 16
RcktMan77 is on a distinguished road
This looks like a non-matching interface. If it were point-matched interface, then Pointwise would recognize it as an internal interface and wouldn't prompt you to specify it as a boundary patch.
RcktMan77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation MichaelK CFX 12 September 1, 2016 05:15
Basic Nozzle-Expander Design karmavatar CFX 20 March 20, 2016 08:44
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 06:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45.