# how to generate a structured grid around a dimple using Pointwise?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

October 22, 2010, 23:26
how to generate a structured grid around a dimple using Pointwise?
#1
New Member

Xu Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
hi everyone.
just as you see in the picture, i want to generate grid with ALL structured cells in this box, so the biggest challenge to me is the structured grid generation around the dimples. i have tried many times but failed in the end. So please gvie me some addvice!
i use Pointwise V16.02R3.
Attached Images
 Snap2.jpg (63.6 KB, 170 views)

 October 23, 2010, 14:26 #2 Senior Member   John Chawner Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA Posts: 255 Rep Power: 11 Hello Xu Zhu. The complicated answer to your question is that there many structured grid topologies that can be applied to the dimples in your attached image. To choose one topology, you need to know whether the perimeter of each dimpled must be modeled accurately from a geometric standpoint. In other words, must there be a circular grid line around the edge of each dimple? If the answer is no, make a simple H grid on the "floor" of your grid using as many points as you feel necessary. Then project that grid onto the database geometry that includes the dimples. When you do this you'll probably find that you'll want to cluster points in the region of the dimples and that's easily done with the subconnector feature in the Distribute command. On the other hand, if you absolutely must have a well defined edge for each dimple, you are then driving to put an H grid inside each dimple or an O-H topology (an O grid at the center of each dimple surrounded by 4 H grids). With a grid in each dimple, you then build topology around and between the dimples out to the rectangular boundaries of the floor. If you send me the dimensions of the floor and dimples or if you can send me your geometry file I might be able to illustrate a few techniques for you. Otherwise, I suggest you contact our Tech Support folks directly and they'll help you get started. Best Regards __________________ John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/ on Twitter: @jchawner

October 24, 2010, 21:11
#3
New Member

Xu Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by jchawner Hello Xu Zhu. The complicated answer to your question is that there many structured grid topologies that can be applied to the dimples in your attached image. To choose one topology, you need to know whether the perimeter of each dimpled must be modeled accurately from a geometric standpoint. In other words, must there be a circular grid line around the edge of each dimple? If the answer is no, make a simple H grid on the "floor" of your grid using as many points as you feel necessary. Then project that grid onto the database geometry that includes the dimples. When you do this you'll probably find that you'll want to cluster points in the region of the dimples and that's easily done with the subconnector feature in the Distribute command. On the other hand, if you absolutely must have a well defined edge for each dimple, you are then driving to put an H grid inside each dimple or an O-H topology (an O grid at the center of each dimple surrounded by 4 H grids). With a grid in each dimple, you then build topology around and between the dimples out to the rectangular boundaries of the floor. If you send me the dimensions of the floor and dimples or if you can send me your geometry file I might be able to illustrate a few techniques for you. Otherwise, I suggest you contact our Tech Support folks directly and they'll help you get started. Best Regards
thanks very much! John Chawner. Helps me lot.
ok, i will send you the geometry file to your email, please give me more details!

October 26, 2010, 18:25
Wing with Dimples
#4
Senior Member

John Chawner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 255
Rep Power: 11
Xu Zhu:

Thanks for sharing the IGES file of a dimpled wing. However, it has no surfaces - only curves. So the first thing I had to do was create surfaces onto which the grid could be projected to give it the right shape. I used simple Coons patches for that. I made one for the wing and four for each dimple (because each dimple was four wedges of curves).

The first picture (simple-project2.png) shows the simplest way to put a structured grid on this shape. Make a single domain on the wing surface then project it (using the Linear method) onto the dimple surfaces only. You can probably also see the drawback - the edges of the dimples are not reproduced cleanly. This effect can be minimized by increasing the number of points.

The second picture (dimple-topos.png) shows how to get a crisp edge around each dimple. You have to mesh each dimple with it's own grid topology and I've shown three ways to do that. The lower left what's called a butterfly or O-H topology - 4 H-grids wrapped around an O-grid. Upper right is a simple O-grid but it's drawback is a pole (line singularity) at the center. Finally, upper left is an H-grid. This is simplest to generate but you have to decide whether the cells in the corners meet whatever mesh quality criteria your solver requires.

The most difficult part of putting a mesh in each dimple is connecting them all with a structured grid topology on the wing surface itself. I think you can see how the grid lines would have to run from leading edge to trailing edge and connect all the dimples. That's just a little connector drawing, domain creating, then copying and pasting. You'd finish up with a little run of the solver with projection onto the wing shape and you're done.

I hope this helps.
Attached Images
 simple-project2.jpg (17.1 KB, 123 views) dimple-topos.jpg (16.8 KB, 115 views)
__________________
John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com
Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/

October 27, 2010, 12:14
#5
New Member

Xu Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by jchawner Xu Zhu: Thanks for sharing the IGES file of a dimpled wing. However, it has no surfaces - only curves. So the first thing I had to do was create surfaces onto which the grid could be projected to give it the right shape. I used simple Coons patches for that. I made one for the wing and four for each dimple (because each dimple was four wedges of curves). The first picture (simple-project2.png) shows the simplest way to put a structured grid on this shape. Make a single domain on the wing surface then project it (using the Linear method) onto the dimple surfaces only. You can probably also see the drawback - the edges of the dimples are not reproduced cleanly. This effect can be minimized by increasing the number of points. The second picture (dimple-topos.png) shows how to get a crisp edge around each dimple. You have to mesh each dimple with it's own grid topology and I've shown three ways to do that. The lower left what's called a butterfly or O-H topology - 4 H-grids wrapped around an O-grid. Upper right is a simple O-grid but it's drawback is a pole (line singularity) at the center. Finally, upper left is an H-grid. This is simplest to generate but you have to decide whether the cells in the corners meet whatever mesh quality criteria your solver requires. The most difficult part of putting a mesh in each dimple is connecting them all with a structured grid topology on the wing surface itself. I think you can see how the grid lines would have to run from leading edge to trailing edge and connect all the dimples. That's just a little connector drawing, domain creating, then copying and pasting. You'd finish up with a little run of the solver with projection onto the wing shape and you're done. I hope this helps.
Dear John Chawner
Thank you very much!! As you said, the most difficult is to connect all the dimples with a structured grid tolology on the wing surface, i will try to make it.
BTW, today i want to define a line( actually it is a parafoil) surrounded by unstructured grid the WALL boundary condition, but it seems the pointwise V16 can do this for me. i want to know if i can define a line the WALL boundary condition using pointwise V16.
Attached Images
 question.jpg (48.3 KB, 53 views)

 October 27, 2010, 14:17 #6 Senior Member   John Chawner Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA Posts: 255 Rep Power: 11 Xu Zhu: I don't understand your question about "define a line the WALL boundary condition." You can create lines. You can apply wall boundary conditions. But I'm not exactly certain what you're asking. Also, you mention "unstructured" grid but we have been discussion structured grids. __________________ John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/ on Twitter: @jchawner

October 27, 2010, 21:19
#7
New Member

Xu Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by jchawner Xu Zhu: I don't understand your question about "define a line the WALL boundary condition." You can create lines. You can apply wall boundary conditions. But I'm not exactly certain what you're asking. Also, you mention "unstructured" grid but we have been discussion structured grids.
The structured gird generation around the dimple is already solved through your kind help. This is an another problem, . As you see in the picture, this is a parafoil section with a leading edge cut, i want to define it the WALL boundary condition, but it seems i can not do it using pointwise V16? Thanks!
Attached Images
 question_grid.jpg (99.6 KB, 87 views)

 October 28, 2010, 08:08 #8 Senior Member   John Chawner Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA Posts: 255 Rep Power: 11 If you're asking whether you can set a flow solver boundary condition on the box outlined in light blue color which appears to me to be a connection to an outer domain, the answer is no - the version of Pointwise you have cannot over-write an interblock connection with a boundary condition. (You would have to repair this manually in the boundary condition file exported for your solver.) However, Pointwise Version 16.04 will be released soon and it does let you overwrite a connection with a BC. Is that your question? __________________ John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/ on Twitter: @jchawner

October 28, 2010, 21:37
#9
New Member

Xu Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by jchawner If you're asking whether you can set a flow solver boundary condition on the box outlined in light blue color which appears to me to be a connection to an outer domain, the answer is no - the version of Pointwise you have cannot over-write an interblock connection with a boundary condition. (You would have to repair this manually in the boundary condition file exported for your solver.) However, Pointwise Version 16.04 will be released soon and it does let you overwrite a connection with a BC. Is that your question?
That's it! ' the version of Pointwise you have cannot over-write an interblock connection with a boundary condition'. i just want to make clear of it.
Thanks very much! You are really a very kind man.
Looking forward to using V 16.04!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post user Main CFD Forum 6 November 25, 2010 02:14 Remy Main CFD Forum 1 December 22, 2008 05:49 David FLUENT 4 June 8, 2005 16:20 Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59 Chuck Leakeas Main CFD Forum 2 May 26, 2000 11:18