CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

Irregular Waves - Segmentation Fault

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Chalwwz

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 21, 2021, 05:54
Default Irregular Waves - Segmentation Fault
  #1
Member
 
Ismael Incoencio
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
IADInocencio is on a distinguished road
Hi good day again, sorry for the incessant posts and queries. But am generating the ctrl.txt incorrectly for irregular waves? Whenever I toggle to B 92 31 it gives me a segmentation fault; the start and end of the error message is attached as images. But if I switch it back to B 92 2, it works just fine. I think I must be missing some code definition somewhere that I am not aware of.

ctrl.txt

control.txt

error1.JPG

error2.jpg
IADInocencio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2021, 10:38
Default Solution to the irregular wave crashing
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Weizhi
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 11
Chalwwz is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Thanks for sharing the problem and control files. The main issue that leads to the crashing is that you used B 91 option for the irregular wave generation, i.e. defining Hs and wave length (corresponding to Tp). However, we only supported B 93 option with Hs and Tp for irregular waves. It is recommended to use B 93 since this is the common practice to use Hs and Tp for irregular wave spectrum definitions. Option B 91 is also made available now in the new code, should be working in the next release.

Aside from the crashing issue, there are also some suggestions and tips to improve your simulations:

1. For irregular wave, you often need to define more parameters, e.g. 1) the spectrum that you want (B 85), 2) the number of wave components you need (B 86) and the starting and ending frequency of your frequency band of choice (B 87).

2. F 42 in your ctrl.txt should be 10.0 instead of 1.0. It should be the height of your numerical wave tank and be larger than F 60, the still water level. F 42 in ctrl.txt should match the last digit of your B 10 command in the control.txt file.

3. We don't use capital letters in the comment sections (e.g. you used '// ... Longuet-Higgens'), sometimes the program will interpret them as commands even though they are in the comment zone after the // sign.

4. It is recommended to use longer wave tank for irregular waves (15 peak wave lengths), it helps with more stable wave statistics.

5. For you case, it is recommended to use relaxation method for the wave absorption, i.e. B 99 1, since your water condition is quite deep and active wave absorption (B 99 3) works the best with shallower waters.

Try using B 93 and follow the suggestions to change your setups, it should work better.

Good luck!

Weizhi
277649496 likes this.
Chalwwz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2021, 20:44
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ismael Incoencio
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
IADInocencio is on a distinguished road
Good morning Weizhi,

Thank you for the very detailed response! Going through item by item:

1) Yes I realized this after I had posted and tried adding these but it would still not run correctly, likely because I did not address the issues related to your other suggestions
2) I had not thought to switch to defining Hs and T instead of L.
3) Thanks for confirming this potential issue, I was also getting errors in my other Channel simulations saying that the ctrl and control.txt's have different number of core definitions whenever I added comments, even though I was sure they were correct.
4) Thanks for this suggestion, I will definitely increase the length later on; I was limiting it to a small wave tank right now just to try and get a stable run going on. I am just on a 6 core laptop, so simulations take a while
5) If I intended the waves to be impinging on a slipway (around 12% slope) or a revetment with a seawall, would relaxation still be recommended?

Again thank you for your suggestions!
IADInocencio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2023, 07:43
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Bhargav
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 3
Varada is on a distinguished road
To create waves within a numerical wave tank using a spectrum, is it essential to activate B 92 along with B 85, 86, 87, and 93? If so, which wave theory would be the appropriate choice for this scenario?
Varada is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2023, 04:48
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Weizhi
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 11
Chalwwz is on a distinguished road
Hi, normally you can choose '1-st order irregular wave' for B 92, that is option 31. B 85, B 86, B 87 are always activated, either using user-defined values or the code will take the default values in pre-set in the program as indicated in the user manual as well. B 93 is also essential, because here you defined Hs and Tp, which in term influence the spectrum shape.
- Bests, Widar
Chalwwz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Segmentation fault when running dieselFoam or dieselEngineFoam in parallel francesco OpenFOAM Bugs 4 May 2, 2017 21:59
Segmentation fault in SU2 V5.0 ygd SU2 2 March 1, 2017 04:38
Segmentation fault when running in parallel Pj. OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 April 8, 2015 08:12
Segmentation Fault w/ compiled OF 2.2.0 - motorBike example sudo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 April 2, 2013 17:27
segmentation fault when installing OF-2.1.1 on a cluster Rebecca513 OpenFOAM Installation 9 July 31, 2012 15:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32.