Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
June 17, 2012, 07:38
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
June 17, 2012, 04:50
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
January 29, 2012, 15:10
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
January 29, 2012, 03:06
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
The diffusivity of a substance in another is...
The diffusivity of a substance in another is obtained from kinetic theory and you have to find it from literature (D). This parameter has a dimension of (m2/s) but as I explained the scalar transport...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
January 28, 2012, 15:50
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi,
sure; using Eulerian method seems...
Hi,
sure; using Eulerian method seems reasonable for your purpose if it matches with your goal; nevertheless, selecting Lagrangian procedure has few issues specially in nano particles; so the only...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
January 27, 2012, 03:35
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
August 23, 2011, 09:12
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Dear Iman,
Generally, you can add number of...
Dear Iman,
Generally, you can add number of extra scalar transport to current solver; e.g.: \partial(\rho C)/\partial t+\nabla.(\rho UC)=\nabla.(D\nabla C) + sources
They are added to another...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
August 21, 2011, 09:35
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Dear Iman,
I've done many projects concerning...
Dear Iman,
I've done many projects concerning nano particle distribution and confidently say that UDS is the best way of modelling it because it's applicable to both low and high volume fraction;...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
August 16, 2011, 11:37
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
August 14, 2011, 03:26
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
August 7, 2011, 06:57
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
May 15, 2011, 02:32
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
May 2, 2011, 15:54
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi,
yes of course; I also track particles with...
Hi,
yes of course; I also track particles with it !!!
when this error appears, it means that the libudf file is not created, so notice your compiling procedure or check that in different case files.
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
May 2, 2011, 07:25
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
April 30, 2011, 15:20
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi Iman,
before running your problem with this...
Hi Iman,
before running your problem with this UDF, you have to set the number of user variables in DPM panel. (you have used one user variable)
Define->models->DPM->UDF-> set the No. of scalars to...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 16, 2011, 09:04
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 15, 2011, 08:41
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 14, 2011, 10:40
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi Iman,
you can't interpret this UDF because...
Hi Iman,
you can't interpret this UDF because P_CELL and P_CELL_THREAD need FLUENT solution, so you should compile that.
for compiling you need visual C++ 2000 or newer(at least ver 6.) installed...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 12, 2011, 10:17
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 9, 2011, 11:59
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 9, 2011, 08:00
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi,
it means that something is wrong in...
Hi,
it means that something is wrong in variables storage. i.e. you have stored a pointer parameter in a structure kind one.
in above UDF, use A*(...) syntax, also check the validity of P_VEL_M1...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 8, 2011, 09:35
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 5, 2011, 15:07
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi iman,
C_U_M1(c,t) : flow x-velocity in...
Hi iman,
C_U_M1(c,t) : flow x-velocity in previous one time step
CURRENT_TIMESTEP : flow time step, you should use that to make your UDF independent of FLUENT changes in time step.
regards,
...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 5, 2011, 08:29
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
Hi iman,
first I think that you mean...
Hi iman,
first I think that you mean acceleration difference?am I right?
yes it's for the flow field part:
du/dt=(C_U(c,t)-C_U_M1(c,t))/CURRENT_TIMESTEP;
for particle part, you can implement user...
|
Forum: Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming
March 5, 2011, 07:58
|
Replies: 52
Views: 15,090
|