|
[Sponsors] |
July 5, 2001, 07:38 |
couples in ver 3.100B
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hallo
I have just switch to ver 3.100B on a windows 2000 platform. I have some old models created in ver 3.100A that I would like to run in 3.100B. The model has some twisted couples but they could work in ver 3.100A. Now trying to run it in ver. 3.100B tells me that the faces of some couples are not close enough to be valid for slave cell and face. Any one got an idea to solve this problem..... Regards Bo |
|
July 10, 2001, 07:37 |
Re: couples in ver 3.100B
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I believe PROSTAR has implemented a new improved scheme to check matching quality. There are two things which you can do: 1. if you are happy with the v3.100A couples, then simply use NOCHECK option when writing geometry file: GEOMW,case.geom,,,nocheck. 2. delete existing couples and match them again in v31.00B. Hope this helps.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cell Couples in CCM+ | norbinou | Siemens | 4 | September 10, 2007 11:00 |
about couples | bv | Siemens | 1 | July 24, 2005 08:05 |
couples issue | carno | Siemens | 1 | April 16, 2004 03:58 |
Boundary Couples | ale | Siemens | 0 | January 26, 2004 06:09 |
couples or not couples... | giosue | Siemens | 5 | March 1, 2003 01:11 |