|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
(Old, unresolved question. Pushed to top.)
Hi, I would appreciate any input from someone with prior experience of FSI with STAR-CD. In the http://www.adapco-online.com/user_ar...ers/index.html article, the authors detailed two main methods of doing FSI calculations: explicit and implicit. Have done the explicit method already but what I really need is the (more accurate & stable) implicit method. The implicit method basically involves repeating the same flow field solution with subsequently more accurate mesh displacements until a certain convergence criterion on the structural calculations is achieved -all within *the same time step*. The way it should run is just like the PISO algorithm. I just need to know how to 'repeat the same time step'. I need help. Somebody? Anybody? |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Implicit vs Explicit method | Donna | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 19, 2019 00:33 |
| strongly implicit method | student | Main CFD Forum | 8 | December 19, 2006 07:57 |
| unstability in semi-implicit method | oishi | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 10, 2003 22:36 |
| Implicit, fractional step method!! | Frederic Felten | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 15, 2002 08:06 |
| implicit method on unstructured grid | Koo | Main CFD Forum | 5 | July 29, 2001 02:43 |