CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

what can cause the negative K?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 24, 2003, 13:01
Default what can cause the negative K?
Posts: n/a
I computed one squarepipe model,the whole model consiste of two partsne part is a small squarepipe,the other part is a big squarepipe,they are coupled by an arbitrary match. when I check the result(,I found some warning messages:there are negative turbulent kinetic energy in some cells,and those cells lie in the connective surface of the two parts. what is the reason that cause the problem? Whether the problem will influence the final results?

I am very grateful for your kind help about that!

Best Regards, Lee
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2003, 20:34
Default Re: what can cause the negative K?
Posts: n/a
If the cells are arbitrary coupled, then there can still be regions where the coupling fails at the edge where the small square duct interfaces with the big duct. Especially if you are not using partial arbitrary couples. Then the actual area of the interface is not equal with the cross sectional area of the small duct. And i suspect that starCD views a couple of the cells that are not coupled as walls in the middle of nowhere and tries to apply wall treatment which results to negative k. If you make a couple of section views at different angles and choose to view only the surface then you should see the regions where coupling fails as walls. Will it influence the results. Sure, if you have a smaller cross sectional area at the arbitrary interface than you should have, the mean velocity through the arbitrary coupled cross section should increase. If the blocked area is a big percentage of the interface cross sectional area, then the results will be affected.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
negative RPM NTM FLUENT 1 September 12, 2008 01:47
Negative pressure! Neel CFX 0 March 19, 2008 08:47
Negative Pressure Kevin NUMECA 5 January 9, 2006 01:22
negative vol roy FLUENT 3 April 27, 2004 10:38
negative uds value despite zero bc Elmar Riesmeier FLUENT 3 June 11, 2001 22:22

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:47.