CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

Unresolved & Problem Cells of Solid Type

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 1, 2005, 13:57
Default Unresolved & Problem Cells of Solid Type
Posts: n/a
when I use the es-aero tool to generate volume meshes for the extern flow around a car surface and the run check option to check the final meshes, there are always some unresolved cells and problem cells of solid type. and if I change their type to fluid and press the run check button again, the numbers of unresolved cells and problem cells will be zero. How come? and does anyone how to fix them properly? thanks in advance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2005, 16:11
Default Re: Unresolved & Problem Cells of Solid Type
Posts: n/a
As I said in your last email on this subject, just ignore them. If you have meshed your vehicle appropriately; correct cell size, good refinement scheme, using a sub-surface of good quality, the bad cells will probably not effect the solution. Besides, fixing all of the problems will take a very long time.

The bad cells have been labeled bad because they probably won't run. Moreover, when you write the .geom file with the button that's inside ES-Aero, additional bad cells will be found and turned to solid. Bad cpmatches will also be on the chopping block. These checks and the subsequent model modifications are increasing your chances of getting a model that will run.

That said, there are a few things to do that will decrease your 'bad' cell count.

Get the latest versions of ammbatch and surfacewrapper (if you are wrapping your geometry). Depending on how old your versions are, you could see significant improvement in mesh quality.

Check your sub-surface for problems, visually as well as with the surface mesh checker. Issues in the sub-surface can/will manifest themselves in the trimmed mesh.

Choose appropriate mesh/template generation parameters. Use a good default surface cell size. Define surface and volume refinements that will capture the more detailed portions of your geometry. If the default refinement scheme is placing transitions in areas of high curvature, expand the refinement. And finally, don't use too many lines to control hard edges in the trimming.

I hope this helps.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boundary type for solid-liquid interface Jake FLUENT 5 May 10, 2012 06:40
[Commercial meshers] Import error Gambit msh file with Cell Type 7 polyhedral cells philippose OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 June 1, 2007 10:14
Solid cells on symplane boundaries samu Siemens 7 May 29, 2006 11:07
Flow through solid cells Julie Polyakh Siemens 1 September 6, 2003 09:18
Building solid cells kerem pekkan Siemens 0 November 21, 2000 18:47

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48.