CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Siemens

implicit calculation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Tushar

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 9, 2005, 06:24
Default implicit calculation
Posts: n/a
I am wondering why Courant Number is a crriterion in an implicit transient calculation? Is Star really full implicit?
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2005, 10:58
Default Re: implicit calculation
Posts: n/a

I think STAR-CD is not fully implicit since it uses SemiImplicit algorithm (SIMPLE,PISO) so at one stroke matrix is not inverted infact the difference equations are solved in transient or psuedo transin using iterative approach marhing in time, Hence cournat number to restrict the time step is required in place of underrelaxation parameters.

sharonyue likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2005, 13:27
Default Re: implicit calculation
Posts: n/a
STAR has an implicit time-integration scheme (at least with the standard procedure). Therefore you can allow yourself to have bigger time steps than with explicit time-marching procedures and have thus a Courant number > 1. Using a courant number is a good check on your time step size, since max. values over 100-150 at some cells can become critical and lead to divergence. You need also to have the Courant number < 1 when you are running free-surface flows with the VOF algorithm.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2005, 10:13
Default Re: implicit calculation
Hubert Janocha
Posts: n/a
please imagine you have a flow which is so fast that during 1 timesteps a particle passes many (!!!) cells. So the code don't see this particle in some cells.

It is true that for a fully implicit scheme the solution progress itself is abolutly stable AND gives a correct solution for the velocities, but the code can crash because of some other reasons (numerical und physical), or the code is smearing the real solution.

So it is important to take a look to the coorant number even in a fully implicit scheme.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Implicit VOF + MRF Grzegorz FLUENT 3 February 27, 2009 08:11
Implicit SPH Tiago Etiene Queiroz Main CFD Forum 2 March 5, 2008 08:25
how implicit is implicit? Joe cool Main CFD Forum 7 July 16, 2004 11:10
implicit coding Endeve Main CFD Forum 0 March 27, 2001 05:05
refernece for implicit RK Chris Reaume Main CFD Forum 1 October 1, 1999 00:58

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:45.