|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello! I've been playing with the unit vectors in Gravity definition for my VOF analysis (water & air sloshing). But I found the results of VOF behavior before & after changing to be EXACTLY the same. As if the changes in gravity e.g. -0.8i+0j-0.2k for a condition of 1.7G magnitude has no effect on water sloshing. We know intuitively that this is not true! (Default G unit vectors are 0i+0j-1k for 1G magnitude). So, my G vector definition could be wrong or is there something else I need to rectify in the settings to have this desired gravity definition?
Urgently please if anyone could help ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Switch on Buoyancy for both phases.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
beautiful! right on the dot! thanks i will try for both phases now.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Set gravity in UDF | Ray Hong | FLUENT | 1 | August 6, 2009 09:05 |
gravity-table.scm scheme file for trans gravity | Shankar | FLUENT | 0 | May 31, 2006 04:30 |
gravity | rashmi | FLUENT | 3 | October 11, 2005 07:21 |
gravity | mettler | FLUENT | 2 | December 4, 2004 21:23 |
Help: gravity in CFX | Dejun Jing | CFX | 2 | July 22, 2002 08:58 |