 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
December 26, 2007, 19:36
|
near wall faster
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When using SST & hybrid wall, why does Star use 2cpus only maximum during writing the ndt or near wall cells, even when we had instructed star to run on 6 or 8cpus? Can this near wall cells identification process be made quicker in some way, to allow it run on more than 2cpus perhaps? The internal limit set by Star for what reasons?
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Making program run faster | Konstantinos | Siemens | 9 | March 8, 2006 11:58 |
| Fortran 90 faster than C/C++ | B. R. Guirguis | Main CFD Forum | 48 | March 6, 2006 13:49 |
| batch mode faster? | Fabian | FLUENT | 1 | June 2, 2005 09:02 |
| MicroTunnel V1.2 - Now 6x faster! | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 18, 2001 23:34 |
| more RAM or faster CPU?? | Fabrizio Grieco | Siemens | 11 | January 23, 2001 07:35 |
Linear Mode
