|
[Sponsors] |
March 17, 2008, 14:31 |
CCM+ Parasolid import
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
... seems to be not very good. I have often problem with this format. IGS works better but the name of the part are not transverted.
step seems to be good either. Maybe higher tesselation solves the problem. Regards Peter |
|
March 19, 2008, 07:13 |
Re: CCM+ Parasolid import
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter,
We have the same issue with parasolid written from SolidWorks. Parasolid 15 through to 18 inclusive gives exported from SolidWorks and imported into CCM+ gives at best a poor surface representation or worse still errors that are extremely difficult to fix with the current CCM+ tools. We currently export with parasolid 14.1 in SolidWorks, which normally gives a correct surface representation in CCM+. Sometimes we use IGES but only if we have to. Regards Peter |
|
March 21, 2008, 05:43 |
Re: CCM+ Parasolid import
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks very much for this useful and for me time saving advice.
Regards Peter |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parasolid import in Gambit | Micheal | FLUENT | 1 | January 19, 2015 02:18 |
CFX meshing tutorials parasolid files | Tanveer ahmad Rubani | CFX | 1 | February 27, 2009 04:46 |
meshing a parasolid import in gambit | Madhukar Rapaka | FLUENT | 2 | May 31, 2006 07:02 |
Importing parasolid model in Gambit | Rahul | FLUENT | 2 | December 20, 2002 00:21 |
Why my Gambit can't import a Parasolid model data? | Linda | FLUENT | 0 | November 11, 2002 08:44 |