|
[Sponsors] |
March 19, 2008, 00:40 |
Range of Y+ for two-layer approach in CCM+
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi What should be the control range for y+ when using realizable k-epsilon turbulence model with two-layer all y+ approach. I have a mesh in which y+ is varying from 0.001 to 50 while using above mentioned model.Can this model accomodate this range of y+ as its name suggesses (all y+) or y+ must be controlled below 1 like in Low-Reynolds number approach. Thanks in Advance.
|
|
March 25, 2008, 14:29 |
Re: Range of Y+ for two-layer approach in CCM+
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What is your aim? Correct pressure loss or heat transfer?
Theoreticaly y+ should not be in a range between 10-25. To check it I would compare the results of two different calculations. One with a finer (y+=0.1-3) and one with a coarser mesh (y+=30-50). When the differences in results are small enough when it is ok. Another possibility: make the mesh finer in areas with y+>5 with volume sources. Achim |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NRBC: Sponge layer approach | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 5, 2013 07:33 |
y+ range | Adam Stuchlik | CFX | 3 | March 12, 2009 16:20 |
Face ID out of range | Wenbin | FLUENT | 1 | January 16, 2006 09:33 |
Global Range | Stephen | FLUENT | 0 | March 29, 2004 09:36 |
salary range | Frank Muldoon | Main CFD Forum | 7 | August 3, 1998 19:04 |