
[Sponsors] 
September 7, 2008, 10:47 
Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi,
Has anyone modeled natural convection in starccm+?! I have a 3D model and modelling of natural convection takes a long time! Any feedback?! 

September 8, 2008, 10:12 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

2d takes long time..
which version do you use? 

September 8, 2008, 10:14 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

3.02


September 8, 2008, 14:15 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi, I'm doing those computations quite often as well as my students. What is your case about?
*steady state or transient? * using radiation? which model? S2S or DO? * what are the BC's? have you got inlet, or just pressure bc, or is it only box enclosed by walls? * is your BC's physically correct? *do you use coupled or segregated solver? what Courant no. or relaxation you use? *how do you decide convergence? (i thing with nat. conv. the residuals are not enough and you should look for variables in control points, you may not achieve large drop in residuals) *is your mesh fine enough at the walls? do you have prisms? *do you use ideal gas model, or boussinesq approx.? *what turbulence model you use? is your y+ correct ... do not take me wrong, those are not stupid questions, only not answering them to yourself is stupid. Even after years you can find yourself trying to compute impossible settings... that is why I'm writing them here... matej 

September 9, 2008, 04:56 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thank you for your comments  here is the answers to your questions:
*steady state or transient? Steady * using radiation? No * what are the BC's? have you got inlet, or just pressure bc, or is it only box enclosed by walls? It's a BOX * is your BC's physically correct? YES *do you use coupled or segregated solver? what Courant no. or relaxation you use? Segregate Solver  relaxation= 0.75 *how do you decide convergence? (i thing with nat. conv. the residuals are not enough and you should look for variables in control points, you may not achieve large drop in residuals) I have Control Points *is your mesh fine enough at the walls? do you have prisms? Yes, and I have Prisms *do you use ideal gas model, or boussinesq approx.? Idea Gas *what turbulence model you use? is your y+ correct  It's Laminar 

September 9, 2008, 07:49 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

OK, now what is the thing that makes you say the convergence is slow? what equation makes a problem? energy?, velocities?
if it is velocity, is the flow really laminar? what is the Rayleigh number at the heated or cooled wall? if the residuals oscillate, you may wish to relax energy more. if that does not help, the flow is probably unsteady by nature, and you need to switch to transient mode. matej 

September 9, 2008, 09:17 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Problem is the energy solver, as the velocity solver is frozen.


September 9, 2008, 15:49 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

aha. now it get interesting. Could you possibly tell me what is the magic trick with which you decoupled artificially velocities from the enthalpy equation?
At least what I was told about natural convection, and what I understood from the world around is, that the nat.conv. is a flow induced by density difference which is caused by the heating or cooling of the fluid in the vicinity of the solid wall of different temperature. In such a flow, the velocities are directly coupled with the temperature (hence enthalpy) through the density (with the help of an ideal gas law). You may argue the density difference is very small, but so are the velocities. So the relative importance of the changes in the momentum equation is high. Now stop breaking the physical laws and turn on the momentum solver, or I shall report you to the authorities ). Or am I completely wrong here, anyone? 

September 17, 2008, 04:03 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#9 
Guest
Posts: n/a

You are right!
natural convection is a flow induced by density difference. But freezing the momentum solver doesn't mean that we are solving only energy equation. we use constant velocity in conjugation with energy equation  Again, it goes back to your statement that velocity and density varies by the time and during the simulation. The problem was "simulation time", and if I turned on the momentum solver it would take forever to solve the problem. Freezing the momentum equation was an assumption to speed up the computational time only. 

September 17, 2008, 14:11 
Re: Natural Convection in StarCCM+

#10 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Ok, but then there must be something wrong. How many cells you have in your model and how many CPUs are you using? What is the time per iteration? Because when you turn the momentum equations back again, you will jump back and have to wait for convergence again, or you end up with rubbish solution.
If the temperature differences are low (say till 40K) you may try to use Boussinesq assumption instead of ideal gas which will make the solution easier. matej 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Natural convection  Ergys Rexhepi  CFX  1  December 17, 2008 09:44 
Natural convection BC  Alex  FLUENT  3  April 19, 2006 14:25 
BCīs natural convection??  Thomas  FLUENT  3  March 15, 2005 13:08 
natural convection again  Jan Langebach  FLUENT  2  September 30, 2004 07:40 
natural convection  Juliet  Siemens  0  November 26, 2003 20:28 