 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
How can the physics branch missing in continua |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 30, 2008, 16:06
|
How can the physics branch missing in continua
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The problem is just as written in the subject. When I started a new simulation and import the objective into star-ccm+, I found the physics section in continua was missing. Any problem with the geometry I developed? Then how can I set the physical parameters? Is it a optional part? Thanks for any advices!
|
|
|
||
|
October 30, 2008, 16:30
|
Re: How can the physics branch missing in continua
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Right click on continua folder -> new physics continua
|
|
|
|
||
|
October 30, 2008, 16:38
|
Re: How can the physics branch missing in continua
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks! Get it!
|
|
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| to identify "pressure inlet" in continua | IKS | Siemens | 1 | November 7, 2008 04:01 |
| K + Epsilon continua initial conditions in CCM+ | dburns | Siemens | 2 | July 3, 2008 12:10 |
| About physics | DAK565656 | Main CFD Forum | 6 | October 6, 2005 02:35 |
| physics? | Girish Bhandari | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 9, 2001 21:21 |
| physics, Dynamics | ziyou | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 31, 1999 12:23 |
Linear Mode
