|
[Sponsors] |
November 4, 2008, 05:02 |
Results compare Star cd V4.06 and 3.26
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody,
my question is simple: Did anybody compare the results of simulations done with Star cd 3.26 and starcd 4.06? I mean a simulation with same setup, same mesh...simply different solver. I have tried but I've got a strange behavior of physics in my solution, with 4.06...did you get something similar? Thanks in advance |
|
November 11, 2008, 02:22 |
Re: Results compare Star cd V4.06 and 3.26
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No, I got the same results
|
|
November 11, 2008, 03:03 |
Re: Results compare Star cd V4.06 and 3.26
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks norbinou, maybe my case has something complicated...
And what about the CPU time? I have a big difference between 3.26 CPU time and 4.06 CPU time...in a transient simulation it is to specify (with same time step). I get different PISO also...??? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Getting Star-CCM+ results to tecplot 360 | Nathan | Siemens | 3 | April 4, 2017 14:18 |
Import STAR-CD results -> Paraview | BenBoo | Siemens | 7 | March 29, 2012 05:02 |
"edge on" results in shut down the star cd ? | nijajo | Siemens | 0 | August 8, 2006 12:55 |
How can I compare the results of different mesh an | nan | FLUENT | 2 | February 20, 2006 21:18 |
Exporting results from Star to Ensight | AJK | Siemens | 1 | February 8, 2006 03:53 |