CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

Low Reynolds Turbulence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 4, 2011, 09:07
Default Low Reynolds Turbulence
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Roxy is on a distinguished road
My question is more about physical analyse than about software problems...
I am studying an internal air flow, and the models working best (getting results close from the experiments) are the Low Reynolds models, so I guess this is the type of my flow.
I've been reading about Low Reynolds models and they all say that you must use 15 to 25 Prism Layers. I found out that using less layers (7) but using a bigger Prism Layer Stretching (2) gets good results as well and uses less time to run the simulation.
Indeed, I understand that the important thing is to have a very thin first sub-layer... More than having a lot of layers.
What does it physically mean to need a thin first sub-layer?

Can anyone help me?
Roxy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2011, 14:36
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15
fher1608 is on a distinguished road
Well, I'm not an expert, when I donīt know what to do with the inflation I alwais run it once and check for the y+. If it's close to 1 then the mesh is very good. If not I reduce the first layer thickness and calculate again, and the last thing I do if every thing else fails is reducing the height and inserting for layers.
So, my advice is to calculate a case and check the y+ before deciding what to do.
fher1608 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2011, 23:33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 16
daveatstyacht is on a distinguished road
Essentially there are two methods of representing the inner portion of the boundary layer. Modeling with wall functions which prescribe the velocity for the first cell based on the algebraic relation of the "wall of the law". The alternative method is to apply boundary conditions on the wall surface and provide sufficient mesh resolution to capture the wall normal velocity gradient accurately. The behavior of the inner portion of the boundary layer is typically divided into three regions (viscous sublayer, buffer region and log region) for which the behavior of the velocity profile is distinctly different. For a fully resolved approach, at least one cell must be within the viscous sublayer (y+<5). However, you should strive to achieve a y+ of around 1 to ensure the sublayer is sufficiently well modeled. With regards to the prism stretching factor, a typical recommendation is not to exceed a ratio of 1.3. Larger ratios can lead to large volume ratios between adjacent layers and insufficient resolution of the velocity gradient (since you wont have enough points in the sublayer and buffer regions), both of which may reduce accuracy. When combined with a y+ of around 1 this tends to lead to 15 to 25 layers of cells being necessary to capture the boundary layer thickness within the prism cell layer. While it is not impossible to get good results with a poorly resolved boundary layer, be aware that another possibility is that errors are canceling one another out which may give you a good answer, but for the wrong reason.
daveatstyacht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2011, 02:18
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Roxy is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your replies!
Roxy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2011, 09:00
New Member
Pablitox's Avatar
Pablo Z
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Argentina
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Pablitox is on a distinguished road
Thanks Dave, your answer is very useful to me too...
Pablitox is offline   Reply With Quote


prism mesh, reynolds number, sub-layer, turbulence

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? Nokadu Main CFD Forum 3 May 26, 2013 11:42
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52
Turbulence Models for very low Reynolds Numbers Sudhi CFX 1 March 2, 2007 18:03
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:58.