CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Turbulent viscosity limited?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By abdul099

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 1, 2012, 19:18
Default Turbulent viscosity limited?
  #1
New Member
 
Breivik
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 14
Breivik is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am modeleing a full skale ship in ccm+ and have done som 20000 iterations, but now in the later iterations i get the message: Turbulent viscosity limited in __ cells in region Region 1. Does anyone know why this occurs? If i stop the solver it also stands that the solution is in an inconsistant state.
And I'm also exsperiencing som fluctuating values of the drag coefficient.

Any respons would be much obliged
Breivik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2012, 08:24
Default
  #2
Member
 
Ryan Coe
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 15
ryancoe is on a distinguished road
This is a limit that you can set. If your simulation is of a particularly high Reynolds number, it may be necessary to increase the limit. There's some info on this in the help manual.
__________________
Ryan
ryancoe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2012, 10:44
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Breivik
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 14
Breivik is on a distinguished road
Ok
So it's under solver - K-Epsilon Turbulent Viscosity - Maximum Ratio?

The Reynolds number is 727361600

thank you for your answer.
Breivik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2012, 13:52
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,665
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
I do not recommend increasing the limit for the viscosity ratio. The default limit is already exceedingly high and difficult to exceed for practical flows. Increasing the tolerance on this limit will increase the likelihood of a runaway (divergence) simulation. So we already know that viscosity ratio cannot be higher than this, why let it?
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2012, 14:44
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Regarding the inconsistent state after stopping: This is just because you've stopped in the middle of a time step. So when you would postprocess in this state, the result depends on the number of inner iterations after starting the current time step. That's the inconsistency.
To get around this, just hit the "step" button. It will run again for the remaining number of inner iterations and then stop after the current time step.

Oscillations of drag coefficients is nothing unusual. Although many people worry about that, it's mostly nothing to worry about. Quite often that's just due to vortex shedding. When it oscillates around a constant value and the amplitude is not too high, don't worry. Average your drag coefficient and you're fine.
ugurcan likes this.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here:
GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP
You may choose any two!
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2012, 15:26
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Breivik
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 14
Breivik is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much guys!
I let the simulation go for another 2000 iterations and it seems to oscillate around a fixed value.

Best regards
Breivik
Breivik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2013, 10:19
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 13
SB123 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
I do not recommend increasing the limit for the viscosity ratio. The default limit is already exceedingly high and difficult to exceed for practical flows. Increasing the tolerance on this limit will increase the likelihood of a runaway (divergence) simulation. So we already know that viscosity ratio cannot be higher than this, why let it?
what to do if getting this message otherwise? just ignore the message and let the program limit the turbulence in ~200 cells in my case or is it a signal of something else wrong with the model?

what about the situation of a moderate Reynolds number 2.3E5?
SB123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reversed flow at pressure inlet and turbulent viscosity is limited.... cfdiscool FLUENT 10 June 10, 2015 06:15
Too low temperature at combustor outlet romekr FLUENT 2 February 6, 2012 10:02
Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity... Cyril FLUENT 16 October 4, 2007 06:12
Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio... Cyril FLUENT 8 February 7, 2006 20:34
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:24.