CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Physic of the field function

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By abdul099

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 12, 2012, 09:03
Default Physic of the field function
  #1
Member
 
David L
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13
fisicas1 is on a distinguished road
Hi guys

I look for exactly that do a field function of Star ccm+ for calculating WALL Y+, I want to know what? the reason? for using this field fucntion from Star ccm+ ... maybe you could said where I find the definition of the WALL Y+, because I do not find in the help it.
fisicas1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2012, 14:18
Default
  #2
Member
 
David L
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13
fisicas1 is on a distinguished road
WALL Y+ is value*u*y/v *where*

u**is the reference velocity,*
y is the normal distance from the centroid to the wall in wall-adjacent cells*
v***is the kinematic viscosity.
fisicas1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2012, 08:52
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ryan Coe
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 15
ryancoe is on a distinguished road
If I understand your question correctly (not sure if I do):

In general, y+ is used a measure of distance in which parts of the boundary layer can be generally defined (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_wall).

The wall y+ field function gives the y+ value at the center of the cell closest to a wall. It is a useful measure of how well you mesh is resolving the boundary layer (lower number = better resolution).

Hopefully this helps.
__________________
Ryan
ryancoe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 14, 2012, 18:59
Default
  #4
Member
 
David L
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13
fisicas1 is on a distinguished road
thanks so much
fisicas1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2012, 15:58
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
I'm sorry Ryan, I have to partly disagree.
A lower number does not automatically mean you better resolve the boundary layer. That's also dependent on the number of layers.
The wall Y+ just let you know if your first cell center is within the viscous layer or in the logarithmic range of the log wall law (or anywhere in between).
A low Y+ doesn't give any advantage when you don't have enough cells to resolve the boundary layer.
LexMedina likes this.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here:
GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP
You may choose any two!
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012 anand_30 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 13 March 7, 2022 17:22
problems after decomposing for running alessio.nz OpenFOAM 7 March 5, 2021 04:49
Field function cannot be evaluated on region pauloabeck STAR-CCM+ 2 April 28, 2011 18:40
Force Report help~ or maybe Custom Field Function sailor FLUENT 0 April 13, 2011 03:45
Interface Matching and Field Function problems PLUH STAR-CCM+ 3 July 6, 2009 08:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:55.