|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Mike Stroup
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Any comments relating the accuracy of these two applications?
thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
I don't know the Autodesk CFD simulation, but you can rely on Star-CCM+.
Of course, the accuracy strongly depends on your setup. It begins with the geometry (is it simplified?), goes over the mesh (discretisation errors, mesh quality) to the boundary conditions (precisely specified, well known, far enough away from the region of interest?). But that's the same for both codes. Also you should not expect to hit any measurement values by 0.00001%, and that's also the same for both codes. No commercial code will do that.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here: GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP You may choose any two! |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compressor Simulation in Star CCM+ | chili023 | STAR-CCM+ | 13 | August 11, 2011 03:22 |
| Problem In Star CCM Plus | ramarya | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | July 10, 2011 06:59 |
| Fluent Vs Star CCM | firda | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 26, 2011 03:51 |
| error in star ccm | maurizio | Siemens | 3 | October 16, 2007 06:17 |
| Car/Truck traffic Simulation with CFD ?? | Thierry | FLUENT | 2 | April 10, 2003 19:48 |