|July 12, 2013, 05:11||
Optimization of small elements of construction
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2Rep Power: 0
I am optimizing aerodynamic of small element of car in Star-CCM+.
I have several parameters defining it's geometry.
As it is necessary carry out a series of calculations, important to minimize the run time.
I have few suggestions:
1) Carry out one calculation of car aerodynamic then consider only small space around element. Use calculated velocity field as boundary for reduced space.
2) Carry out many calculations with different parameters and rough calculation grid then choose few best results and recalculate them at grid with more elements.
How can I do that? What features of Star-CCM+ should I use?
|July 14, 2013, 02:26||
siamak rahimi ardkapan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 218Rep Power: 10
I think specially your second strategy is very good. you can start with a coarse mesh ( element) and then by finding the proper physics, refine the mesh and run the simulation again. It can be done by changing the reference value of the mesh.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|.STL: non-closed manifold surface||giulio.topazio||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||32||November 25, 2016 04:15|
|elements, nodes and faces||Andy||CFX||10||July 7, 2013 22:40|
|Turbulence in a small microjet cooling system||Bladimir||FLUENT||0||June 3, 2012 09:56|
|2D Meshing - No matter how thin my model is, it is still 2 elements thick||RossFS||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||6||April 14, 2010 00:13|
|ICEM and CFX report different number of elements||Chris Basciano||CFX||0||July 20, 2007 17:24|