CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   STAR-CCM+ (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/star-ccm/)

 the new one October 16, 2013 04:40

Hi
What are the suitable boundary condition for free convection in starccm+. I am trying to simulate natural convection of a sphere in open atmosphere. so my thought was that freestream conditon all around with very low velocity and boundaries at a very large distanec would work but it dooesnt seem to give physical results. Any suggestions.I have also already triend with adiabatic walls at a large distance.
any suggestions or your experiences with such problems will be appreciated.
Thanks

 Cobra June 13, 2017 11:49

I know this answer is coming pretty late, but I think it still may be useful for someone looking for it.
You should build a spherical domain around your object, with a diameter 3 to 5 times the major diagonal of the object.
Boundary condition should be 'Pressure Outlet'. As pressure you should probably set Field Function 'Pressure' (not 100% sure here, but for me it worked most of the times).
When I tried to use a bigger domain (say 20 times the major diagonal) the solution couldn't converge.

 me3840 June 15, 2017 14:44

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Cobra (Post 653047) Boundary condition should be 'Pressure Outlet'. As pressure you should probably set Field Function 'Pressure' (not 100% sure here, but for me it worked most of the times).

Don't do this. The field function 'pressure' is solved for. The whole point of a pressure condition is to specify the pressure. You can make your own field function named pressure and use that, but do not use the internal field function pressure. I don't think it makes any sense to do that.

 Cobra June 16, 2017 05:29

I agree, I was wrong in my previous reply. In the Adapco website I found a guide to set the boundary conditions for open air natural convection

https://thesteveportal.plm.automatio...S/FAQ/RD-5-112

From what I understood the Field Function should be written as:

-1.18*9.81*\$\$Position[2]*((300/\$Temperature)-1)

where 1.18 is representing the reference density.

Right now I'm waiting for a renewal of my licence so I can't test its validity.

 cwl June 16, 2017 09:17

 me3840 June 18, 2017 22:57

Remember that function requires you set your z=0 value to be the altitude where the piezometric pressure is the same as the static pressure.

 Cobra July 10, 2017 14:39

Update: I tried to run some simulations with the new boundary condition for pressure, i.e. -1.18*9.81*\$\$Position[1]*((300/\$Temperature)-1), which I found on the Steve Portal.
Unfortunately I can't make my simulation work with this BC either.
I still get fluid movements driven by pressure differentials at the atmospheric contour.
I tried the condition with both the Boussinesq and the Ideal Gas models.
I don't know what else I could try.

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:08.