|November 27, 2013, 10:09||
Numerical diffusion in ccm and fluent
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 56Rep Power: 7
So I recently worked on a laminar mixing species transport problem in Star. I had done this problem in Fluent before and gotten good results, so I wanted to see how robust star's solver would be. It was a simply Y connection with two similar species. I noticed that, unless I had the mesh aligned with the flow, I got crazy amounts of numerical diffusion. The same problem in Fluent however was handled (similar mesh size and settings, also unstructured) just fine, with almost no noticeable numerical diffusion.
I have three questions:
1. Has anyone experienced this before?
2. Is this a sign that Star's solver might simply be weaker?
3. Does this mean that their solvers for all other equations might fall to the same weakness? I.e. should I be worried about momentum and turbulence models being too diffuse?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Euler angles in fluent ....||bharath||FLUENT||0||March 25, 2013 20:25|
|Fluent Vs Star CCM||firda||Main CFD Forum||3||February 26, 2011 03:51|
|A genearl question on STAR CCM||nstar||STAR-CCM+||5||June 24, 2009 09:39|
|OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX||marco||Main CFD Forum||81||March 31, 2009 14:22|