CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   STAR-CCM+ (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/star-ccm/)
-   -   Mesh at a sharp corner (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/star-ccm/141340-mesh-sharp-corner.html)

crevoise September 5, 2014 07:19

Mesh at a sharp corner
 
2 Attachment(s)
Hello

I am getting some convergence problem due too a sharp corner on my geometry. More precisely, the turbulent dissipation rate get residual up to 10, while getting high value at that corner on few cells.
I guess my mesh at that corner is not the best (see attached), and I wanted to know if someone has some hint on how to improve it.

Thank a lot for any help

Attachment 33572

Attachment 33573

Gary6891 September 5, 2014 12:51

Cell quality remediation
 
Did you try Cell quality remediation option? Or your initial values might be worth rechecking

cwl September 5, 2014 13:47

Finer mesh based on Volume Shape might help

crevoise September 8, 2014 08:49

2 Attachment(s)
Thanks a lot for your answers.
I did tried the cell remediation, but did not realy influence that much.
However, as suggested, I checked my initial values and modified them with some values obtained aith some not well converged computations. Thus the residuals are much better. (see pictures)

I have then a question, to get more light on this as I am not an expert.
I was thinking that the inital values should have an influence on the 'rapidity' of the convergence, but not on the accuracy of the solution.
However, but having good inital values shows that the solution is converging properly, while wrong values do not allow convergence to accurate solution.
So it seems that the initial values have an influence on the final solution, which sounds strange to me.
Am I wrong in my understanding on solution independency toward initial values?

Thanks again for your help and your info.

cwl September 17, 2014 11:35

In case of convergence of the simulation - changing initial values should result only in rapidity of convergence; but convergence itself is highly affected by Solver Settings like CFL, Under-Relaxation Factors.
The convergence in terms of (low) Residuals is not a strict convergence; i believe that simulation run can be considered complete, converged and ok - when mass and heat (at least) ballances (computed using Reports and Field Functions) do converge, - and that i consider a criteria.

me3840 September 23, 2014 22:38

Don't touch the URFs or use cell quality remediation. The problem is your mesh. Your prism mesh is far too coarse, you only have 2 prisms, and it looks like it's not thick enough. What's the y+ on that surface? It's probably through the roof. Your boundary layer looks like it's well outside the prism layer on that cut.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27.