CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

2D Results different the 3D results

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2014, 10:22
Default 2D Results different the 3D results
  #1
New Member
 
王慕之
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Chinamuzhi is on a distinguished road
I find a big problem when caculated the two-dimension circular pipes model with Star-CCM9.02.When I convert Regions to 2D.The results of the 2D were different from 3D.The volecity(i) in 2D Region si roughly half of the results when caculated in 3D Region directly. The 3D results were close to the literature.

I buit a cylindrical coordinate system.
The physics models: Constant desity
laminar
Gradients
liquid
Segregated Flow
Steady
Three Dimensional
Inlet volecity fild function:1*0.002-10964*0.002*($$Position("Cylindrical 1")[0]*$$Position("Cylindrical 1")[0])

Thanks a lot to give me a help.
Chinamuzhi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2014, 05:44
Default
  #2
New Member
 
王慕之
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Chinamuzhi is on a distinguished road
My teacher told me that :Maybe Star-CCM+ won't use the cylinderical N-S equation when caculated in the 2D plane and did't regard the rectangles as the section of the cylindercial pipes.
Chinamuzhi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
circular pipe flow, convert to 2d

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OpenFOAM - Validation of Results Ahmed OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 May 13, 2018 19:28
lid driven cavity varying results yasmil OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 October 6, 2016 22:42
interFoam simulation yields inconsistent results for alpha1 surface Ralinus OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 January 13, 2014 09:54
CFD results not close to experimental results cider STAR-CCM+ 0 July 8, 2013 08:53
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 Rajeev Kumar Singh FLUENT 6 December 19, 2010 12:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:53.