|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Divyaprakash
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Is there a way to control the numerical dissipation in star ccm+ . I am solving for supersonic flow over a forward step, inviscid case. I get boundary layers like structures near the wall behind the step. I think it maybe due to artificial viscosity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 26 ![]() |
If you aren't using a 1st order scheme then you shouldn't have an issue with artificial viscosity, but there is a blended accuracy factor you can adjust to get a scheme in between 1st and 2nd order in the coupled solver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| artificial viscocity, compressible, numerical dissipation, supersonic |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problem with divergence | TDK | FLUENT | 13 | December 14, 2018 07:00 |
| Artificial Viscosity | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio | Main CFD Forum | 12 | November 13, 2011 11:21 |
| Artificial viscosity | rads | CFX | 2 | July 31, 2006 08:02 |
| artificial viscosity | rvndr | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 2, 2004 11:24 |
| Artificial Viscosity | Girish Bhandari | Main CFD Forum | 5 | January 13, 2001 14:22 |