CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

steady in cylinder simulations: having problems with the mesh and simulation settings

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 22, 2015, 05:56
Default steady in cylinder simulations: having problems with the mesh and simulation settings
  #1
New Member
 
yikai shao
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
shaoyikai813 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,
I am doing inlet port design as my uni project with star ccm+. I am having problems now but my supervisor is away.


First of all I am planning to simulat two engine speed, 4500rpm and 14500rpm.
There is not a option of velocity outlet. How can I simulate different engine speed? Currently, I am having pressure outlet with negtaive number which makes outlet avg velocity around the piston mean velocity at that engine speed. Is it right way to do?

Secondly, I have mesh error when I use corse mesh such as 3mm base mesh. As picture shows below:


It is fine if I use fine mesh like 1mm. It getting worse as base mesh getting bigger. I created the geometry in Solidoworks and input into ccm with STEP file.

The last is the simulations are not converging with any of mesh size. The polt of outlet mass flow showing wave.

The model I used:





Thank you in advance.
shaoyikai813 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2015, 08:12
Default
  #2
New Member
 
yikai shao
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
shaoyikai813 is on a distinguished road
All good now. Solved mesh error with decrease min gap between two parts to 0.5mm. And results became stable as well.
shaoyikai813 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2015, 11:53
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
FYI, I think you can specify a velocity outlet by giving a negative value. I know this can be done with a mass flow inlet as an outlet, I would assume that it would work for velocity as well.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2015, 03:47
Default
  #4
New Member
 
yikai shao
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
shaoyikai813 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBdonCFD View Post
FYI, I think you can specify a velocity outlet by giving a negative value. I know this can be done with a mass flow inlet as an outlet, I would assume that it would work for velocity as well.
Two inlets? Ok. I will try
shaoyikai813 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2015, 04:47
Default
  #5
New Member
 
yikai shao
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
shaoyikai813 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBdonCFD View Post
FYI, I think you can specify a velocity outlet by giving a negative value. I know this can be done with a mass flow inlet as an outlet, I would assume that it would work for velocity as well.
Two inlets? Ok. I will try
shaoyikai813 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2015, 08:45
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
I wouldn't do 2 inlets. You can have one downstream or one upstream. The opposing inlet/outlet should be either a pressure outlet or stagnation inlet. Chances are you will have some convergence issues if you try to use a velocity inlet/outlet arrangement.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2015, 08:49
Default
  #7
New Member
 
yikai shao
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
shaoyikai813 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBdonCFD View Post
I wouldn't do 2 inlets. You can have one downstream or one upstream. The opposing inlet/outlet should be either a pressure outlet or stagnation inlet. Chances are you will have some convergence issues if you try to use a velocity inlet/outlet arrangement.
Im running stagnation inlet and pressure outlet. You think mass flow inlet with preasure outlet will.be.better?
shaoyikai813 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2015, 08:50
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
that would be my choice, I think.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 06:40
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 December 1, 2020 11:12
Problem in initializing transient simulation with a finer mesh sidd CFX 8 April 29, 2016 02:25
Forces Acting on a Rotating Cylinder (Moving Mesh) dreamchaser CFX 5 April 25, 2015 06:01
Transient simulation and sliding mesh problems alige FLUENT 0 May 8, 2006 03:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:44.