CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

pierced faces after import from solidworks

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 12, 2015, 13:47
Default pierced faces after import from solidworks
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
MchCAD is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

my job is to design a 3D-CAD model in solidworks and then import it into star ccm+.

However, I'm getting a lot of pierced faces. As the project will be an automated simulation, the fixing of the pierced faces cannot be done within star ccm+.

Now I'm wondering how you guys manage to export geometry from solidworks without obtaining pierced faces in star ccm+.
And what kind of preparations you do in solidworks to achieve that.

Is there any way to influence the surface mesh generation done within solidworks before exporting to step or parasolid?

Best regards,
MchCAD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2015, 10:20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
This is not uncommon, however, star-ccm+ is usually pretty good at fixing these faces. When you say it cannot be done within the program, are you doing manual repair or using an automated mesh operation with automatic surface repair enabled? Auto-repair almost always works for me (and I too use solidworks).

The problem could potentially lie with the parasolid export itself and not your model. If you have a license for the solidworks cadexchange then try bringing in the native CAD files rather than an export. That could help solve the issue.

Are the parts being recognized as valid when you bring them in? If not you can try checking the check parts' validity and repair invalid bodies boxes in the import surface options menu when you import.

Another potential cause of pierced faces are two separate bodies that have identical faces (that will eventually form an interface). So if you have multiple bodies contacting each other (fluid-fluid, fluid-porous, fluid-solid, etc...) the faces of the 'identical' surfaces could be piercing each other. You may need to clear contacts and imprint the bodies in surface repair manually.

If all that fails/isn't possible then your only option is to determine what faces are being pierced and try to rebuild it in CAD before you import.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2016, 10:04
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
MchCAD is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your answer.
It helped steering me in the right direction.

The parts all have been recognised as valid.

Unfortunately the automatic surface repair option and auto repair didn't work out.

A main problem was the contact in between the parts.
Several imprint operations with the correct priority indexing helped solving the issue.

However, I never achieved a conformal mesh. Instead I ticked the 'per part meshing' option, so for every part a seperate mesh was generated.

Regarding the pierced faces, they are still getting displayed, yet there is no problem with most of the operations.

I tried out to import the solidworks file directly with the cad exchange license. However, there was no difference.

From now on we'll try to deal with the non conformal mesh.

Thank you so much.

Best regards,
MchCAD is offline   Reply With Quote


export, import, pierced faces, solidworks, step

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compressor Simulation using rhoPimpleDyMFoam Jetfire OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 107 December 9, 2014 14:38
[ICEM] Import geometry from solidworks holyo ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 April 16, 2014 12:47
Possible Bug in pimpleFoam (or createPatch) (or fluent3DMeshToFoam) cfdonline2mohsen OpenFOAM 3 October 21, 2013 10:28
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 10:01
Unaligned accesses on IA64 andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 11:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24.