CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Pressure value not matching to experimental result

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 21, 2015, 09:36
Default Pressure value not matching to experimental result
  #1
Member
 
Kamal Bisht
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 10
Bisht is on a distinguished road
Hi I am simulating a multiphase problem on fuel tank filling process. with VOF method
I have pressure sensor experimental value which is located at the top of the fuel tank surface. As flow starts, pressure remains zero in tank for a time period of 0.2 s and than starts increasing because of compression of air inside the tank.
But during simulation, pressure is kept fluctuating between 250 to 500 pascal for the whole time period from the starting point.

I am taking pressure outlet and mass flow inlet. Initial condition and boundary condition is zero pascal with reference pressure of 101325 pa.

Please find the attached images of the pressure graph.
Why simulation value is so different from experimental result?
Attached Images
File Type: png Simulation result.png (97.7 KB, 56 views)
File Type: png Experimental result.PNG (25.6 KB, 54 views)
Bisht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2015, 11:20
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 24
me3840 is on a distinguished road
This could just be noise in the numerics, those are really small pressure values. I would ensure:
1. Your CFL is good during the run
2. Your timesteps are converging
3. Your timestep is small enough
and you can consider running double-precision.
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2015, 06:57
Default
  #3
Member
 
Kamal Bisht
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 10
Bisht is on a distinguished road
Hi, thanks for your suggestion.

I tried it with finer mesh also and a smaller time step but still the minimun pressure value I am getting during my simulation as 170 Pascal which is certainly very wayward to the experimental minimal value of the Pascal. As you can see in previous attachment maximum experimental value is increasing continuously to 1400 Pascal because of the compression of air but in simulation I can't see this effect.

I am using double precision for my simulation.
Bisht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2015, 12:27
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Kevin
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 13
kirrer is on a distinguished road
I'm not quite sure of the boundaries and/or the assumption that air is compressing. If you have a pressure outlet, this should prevent air from compressing as it can leave the control volume. On the other hand, if you have compressing air, you cannot have a pressure outlet. Are you able to share a rough schematic of your tank?
kirrer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2015, 01:28
Default
  #5
Member
 
Devesh Baghel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 17
devesh.baghel is on a distinguished road
Hi Kamal,

1. Is your test model and simulation model stand at same plateform while start of filling of tank i.e. empty tank or prefilled in both test and simulation ?

2. Are you modeling carbon canister into your simulation ? also outlet is just air vent defined as pressure outlet ?

3. If you have smooth air out with empty tank, dome will not experience pressure at initial time-steps as shown in test results.


Regards
Devesh
devesh.baghel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2015, 03:37
Default
  #6
Member
 
Kamal Bisht
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 10
Bisht is on a distinguished road
Hello,

Air is compressing in the tank domain because outlet is not big enough to let all the air escape from domain.

I have done experimental test with empty tank and for simulation also I am considering tank to be empty.

Yes Outlet is defined as pressure outlet with volume fraction of air as one and fuel as zero. Inlet is a mass flow inlet with fuel volume fraction as one and air as zero. Intitial condition and pressure outlet is at zero pascal relative pressure, environmental pressure 1 bar.

Please find my domain geometry in the atthment for your reference.
Attached Images
File Type: png Domain.PNG (64.8 KB, 41 views)
Bisht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2015, 16:34
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Reza
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17
triple_r is on a distinguished road
Are you using ideal gas law or real gas law for air? or are you assuming the air to be incompressible (constant density)?
triple_r is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2015, 16:44
Default
  #8
Member
 
Kamal Bisht
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 10
Bisht is on a distinguished road
I am using constant density Model for both air and fuel (which has same density as of water).
Bisht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2015, 17:02
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Reza
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17
triple_r is on a distinguished road
If you want to model air pressure correctly, then you need to use at least the ideal gas law for air.

By definition, an incompressible fluid (constant density) has to have the same mass flow rate in the inlet and outlet boundaries of the solution domain. So, any pressure difference from inlet to outlet is due to velocity differences and/or viscous effects. So, the phenomenon that you mention: "air is being compressed in the tank as it cannot escape fast enough" cannot be modeled by an incompressible fluid model.
triple_r is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2015, 17:38
Default
  #10
Member
 
Kamal Bisht
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 10
Bisht is on a distinguished road
Oh I see... But isn't Reynolds no. has to be above a specific value to use ideal gas model? I am not using any temperature model for my simulation as it doesn't effect the fluid property but is it same for ideal gas?

Actually I want to simulate the filling process of tank for the first 1s. In that time air is not compressed and leave the domain as desired. But as you can see in previous attachment of the geometry that after sometime air outlet pipe hose is filled with the fuel and then this compression of air phenomenon comes in to effect.

But I am more concerned about the first second of simulation.
Bisht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2015, 00:58
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Reza
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17
triple_r is on a distinguished road
It usually depends on the Mach number, and by rule of thumb, if Mach number is larger than 0.3 you should use compressible fluid. However, if the physics needs compressibility, no matter what Mach number, you should use a compressible fluid.

With regards to temperature, you can still have a constant temperature (isothermal) flow, but that doesn't mean density in constant, as in gases density is a strong function of pressure as well.

I don't know about the duration, but if we look at the extreme case where there is no outlets, just one inlet for air. Then, even a very small velocity (mass flow) at inlet will cause the problem to be ill-posed when using incompressible fluid. That is just how the math works out with continuity. In your case there is an outlet, so it is not as extreme as this limiting case, but this might cause instability in solution.
triple_r is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem in pressure result using periodic BC CFDADIB FLUENT 2 March 4, 2015 14:44
compare theoretical, experimental, analysis result ekfzha55 CFX 1 October 25, 2013 06:51
Comparison the airfoil 0012 experimental result and simulation result harrislcy FLUENT 30 August 29, 2013 10:27
Does star cd takes reference pressure? monica Siemens 1 April 19, 2007 11:26
pressure gradient term in low speed flow Atit Koonsrisuk Main CFD Forum 2 January 10, 2002 10:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47.