CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Low power coefficient in turbine simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 8, 2016, 10:19
Default Low power coefficient in turbine simulation
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13
efe011 is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody,

I'm simulating a tidal turbine as validation case with a moving rotating frame in steady state and I need some advice.

My model has a k-w turbulence model with gamma-re-theta transition model, and I've already simulated a quasi-2D foil succesfully getting error below 7% for lift and less than 1% for drag in the Re range where the turbine works (500k aprox), which is good enough for my purpose.

My mesh is poly with a Y+<1, and I've performed a sensibility analysis to the mesh size, going from 4M to 11M cells, staying finally with a 6M due to independence of the solution.

So, the issue is that, despite I've checked the sensibility to many things, I'm still getting about a 23% smaller power coefficient than the experimental results. Moreover, this skewed results seems to be pretty robust, since after altering several parameters I'm still getting the same. The parameters I've changed:

*Changing the flow speed and turbine rotational speed, keeping their ratio constant (TSR). The idea was to modify the Reynolds number.
*Using half the turbulence intensity for initial conditions and the inflow.(0.1 to 0.05)
*Changing max Y+ from 1 to 0.5
*Using low Y+ instead of All Y+ wall treatment
* By having a Stream Edge Function for Gamma Re Theta as: $WallDistance > a?1:0. I changed the "a" variable from 5mm to 1m.

Any hints on how to get more accurate results??

Thank you very much.

Kind regards.
efe011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2016, 13:22
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13
efe011 is on a distinguished road
During the weekend I performed an analysis over the blockage ratio and I didn't find anything...

Any idea or thought would be really appreciated.
efe011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2016, 15:39
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
Is this an horizontal or vertical axis-turbine? My immediate thought is that your calculation of Cp doesn't jive with what done in the validation case. If you are seeing a nearly constant error of 23%, it could be that your reference area is off by 23%. One way to check would be compare dimensional power (so not Cp, but P) and see what happens.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2016, 09:42
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13
efe011 is on a distinguished road
It is an horizontal axis turbine.

I'm afraid to say that it's not as simple as an area mistake, and I don't have the power data. Instead, I only have the power coefficient as experimental data.

Any other hints? Thank you.
efe011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vertical axis water turbine simulation SHIKHA BHUYAN ANSYS 0 September 16, 2014 01:06
Vertical axis water turbine simulation SHIKHA BHUYAN CFX 1 September 15, 2014 07:40
Torque of wind turbine simulation caohan FLUENT 8 August 11, 2014 23:01
shaft power versus RMP curve in wind turbine simulation zhenduan306 CFX 28 November 8, 2012 10:11
Need help on calculation of power coefficient for contra-rotating turbine altomos CFX 5 October 7, 2012 06:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:42.