|
[Sponsors] |
February 12, 2016, 08:52 |
Large Eddy Simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Deutschland
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10 |
Hey Friends!
Does it make sence to do an LES in a high pressure flow (ideal gas, no constant density)? The aim is to find the detached point of the flow. The flow occurs in sub-, sonic and supersonic flow on an exhaust valve. Thank You! |
|
February 12, 2016, 13:32 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Jesse Dumas
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Typically LES isn't good at predicting flow separation. A better choice might be a detached eddy simulation (DES), which will treat near-wall regions in a RANS-like fashion (as the CFD Online wiki outlines).
|
|
February 18, 2016, 07:54 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65 |
I don't agree that DES will do any better than LES. DES is LES with more models.
I'm not sure what you expect to get from the LES when simpler RANS models will give similar insight. What LES gives you is a time-accurate solution with less modelling than RANS/URANS (more accurate turbulence). Unless you are interested in studying the turbulence itself, there's no reason to do LES over a simpler model. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ABL solver - Large eddy simulation | Davidlt | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | May 8, 2017 01:01 |
Large eddy simulation for flow around cylinder | ash_kul999 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | April 18, 2015 04:47 |
Mean flow field in Large Eddy Simulation | Servantes | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | September 11, 2014 17:32 |
Large Eddy Simulation of helium jets | Rajani | FLUENT | 0 | February 19, 2004 12:25 |
Large Eddy simulation | Andreas Hauser | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 20, 2000 20:33 |