# how to solve gravity in a chimney

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 28, 2016, 09:58 how to solve gravity in a chimney #1 New Member   Peter Sliacky Join Date: Apr 2016 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 8 Hello there, i want to simulate the natural depression in a chimney. The known conditions are the inlet-temperatur @ 553K and the mass-flow @ 0.12g/s. Also the Material Properties are known for heat transfer between fluid and chimney walls. The temperature outside should be 288K. The chimney is 8,6m high. - mesh is valid - k-o SST - Turbulennce is set - pref is 101325Pa - ro,ref is 1,23Kg/m3 (@288K) - altitude @ +z = 8,6m, becaus hier is the static and piezo pressure equal - mass flow inlet with given T and mass flow - pressure outlet @ 0Pa and 288K - steady - coupled flow so i tried a lot of things to achieve a good solution, but the problem is that i receive always backflows into the inner of the chimney. I read something about to define the boundaries with field function, but i dont know how to do this. It would be great if someone has an answer best regards and thank you a lot

 June 28, 2016, 10:15 #2 Senior Member   kevin alun Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 106 Rep Power: 13 if you want to simulate the chimney effect than I don't understand why you would specify the flow rate or are you trying to get the heat transfer from air to wall. What is your goal of the simulation? Maybe you should be running pressure-pressure Getting backflow is a common thing in a natural convection problem, you might want to simulate the space around the outlet of the chimney and use larger and larger cell sizes as you move away from the exit of the chimney. Eike likes this.

 June 28, 2016, 10:49 #3 New Member   Peter Sliacky Join Date: Apr 2016 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 8 thanks for answering. the goal of the simualtion: - depression at inlet - outlet temperature @ given parameters temp. and mass flow Genrally it is an thesis an my prof give me the inputs. Its based on normal households. I have to find out if the depression is big enough and check the temperatur at the outlet because of condensation. Is it possible without space?

 June 29, 2016, 03:24 #4 Senior Member   kevin alun Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 106 Rep Power: 13 Perhaps try this, for the outlet assign it to mass flow rate and input a negative value, for the inlet assign it as pressure, static zero, during the run you will get the error message reverse flow on pressure boundary but that is OK it is correct, I believe you can turn that warning message off. You will have to assign a value for temperature on your mass flow rate boundary but I don't think it will matter because the flow is leaving the domain, for the pressure boundary you also assign a temperature and because the pressure boundary has reverse flow it will use that temperature,

 June 29, 2016, 06:33 #5 New Member   Peter Sliacky Join Date: Apr 2016 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 8 Hi, I tried to change Input and Output with your given response. Now there is no backflow at output, but the flow at input does not work correctly, when you think of the pyhsical relations. So what im now going to do is the following: i want to create space behind output. Therefore i increased the fluid region. I put an extrusion of 2.5m x2.5m x 20m on the output. So now my Ouput is on the top of the extrusion. I defined the other sufraces as walls @ the temperature of the enviroment 288K. Is it right to increase space in that way? Thank you a lot helping me

 June 29, 2016, 06:55 #6 Senior Member   kevin alun Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 106 Rep Power: 13 I thought you didn't want to include any space thus I suggested a negative inlet, but if what you described by adding more space for the outlet that is also a good way forward

 June 29, 2016, 07:23 #7 New Member   Peter Sliacky Join Date: Apr 2016 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 8 yeah, first i dont want to, but the results with your given response were not correct. So now im trying to use a greater space @ outlet. Do you think its ok, how i model space? or how would you define space behind outlet?

 June 29, 2016, 08:02 #8 Senior Member   kevin alun Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 106 Rep Power: 13 If your former outlet is centered where a box sits on top, which is 2.5m by 2.5m which is 20m high that sounds good,

 Tags chimney, gravity

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post dduque OpenFOAM Programming & Development 4 March 10, 2016 09:03 karlli OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 January 15, 2016 12:07 Surajtalele FLUENT 3 April 26, 2013 11:09 matteoL OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 18, 2009 07:58 Drona CFX 7 November 22, 2001 11:28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:20.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top