CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Question about flow split outlet BC

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 29, 2016, 04:19
Default Question about flow split outlet BC
  #1
Member
 
Paul Palladium
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 10
Fauster is on a distinguished road
Dear "Star-ccm+er" !

I would like to calcul drag and lift coefficient for a body. It is appropriate to define a "Flow split outlet" BC on the outlet face (with a ratio of 1) instead of "pressure outlet" BC ? For exemple for wind loading on buildings.

Thanks for your help,
Fauster is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2016, 09:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 24
me3840 is on a distinguished road
No, flow split outlets are for internal systems. You need to use a pressure condition and take care of atmospheric pressure gradients due to gravity.
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2016, 09:15
Default
  #3
Member
 
Paul Palladium
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 10
Fauster is on a distinguished road
Thanks,

At the begining I wanted to set a field function for the static pressure (at the outlet face) :

Ps = -rho.g.z

But the calculation behaved very badly. Maybe I need to use a free stream condition... I am kind of confused because I read many differents things on the internet about appropriate BC for external flows.

Intuitively I would have set a zero gradient BC on lateral and top faces. And a pressure outlet condition on the outlet face. But many authors provides to use a free stream BC on the top face or even a wall BC on lateral faces.

What are your thought ?

Thanks a lot
Fauster is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 30, 2016, 01:27
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
kevin alun
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 14
marmot is on a distinguished road
if you make the boundaries far enough away from your buildings you can use a symmetry, slip wall on top, sides and pressure for the outlet. Like you are simulating a building inside of a wind tunnel

Perhaps though you want to change wind directions, thus instead of a box you have a half sphere, dome for your domain and thus free stream bc would be better.
marmot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 30, 2016, 03:38
Default
  #5
Member
 
Paul Palladium
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 10
Fauster is on a distinguished road
Thanks,

I didn't thought about using half sphere for fluid domain. I should investigate that.
Fauster is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure outlet as a function of the flow rate (windkessel) Trev0r CFX 10 October 23, 2023 16:50
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 06:40
Review: Reversed flow CRT FLUENT 1 May 7, 2018 05:36
Boundary conditions for flow in nozzle kgevers FLUENT 0 July 26, 2015 12:46
Flow Split Setup Question ed FLUENT 1 February 16, 2007 16:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:06.